Hon. Marla O. Anderson See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Monterey County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.8 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   5.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Marla O. Anderson


Comments


Other

Comment #: CA53040
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Very cruel and disrespectful. She does not bother to learn case before ruling. Condescending higher than thou.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA38533
Rating:2.8
Comments:
Said Voir Dire limited to cause only, did not know deposition objections to form are waived at trial, had no idea of case specific hearsay requirements after Sanchez, and allowed an expert to voice new opinions. Clearly did not read briefs or motions. Should stop mailing it in and retire.

Other

Comment #: CA15065
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She may be smart but does not even read the brief or look up when she has no knowledge about the case. I believe she is not fair and should NOT be a judge she has her favorites and lets those Attorneys get away with criminal behavior and should have been dis barred

Other

Comment #: CA15020
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Excellent courtroom demeanor, temperament, and efficiency. Extremely bright and well prepared.