"The Robing Room: CA State Judges

Hon. Susanne Rizo	See Rating Details
Judge Superior Court
Inyo County	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: - 0 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 4 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Susanne Rizo

Comments

Litigant

Comment #: CA54899
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Someone needs to investigate this judge and her questionable rulings.

It's obvious she has an anti-male agenda. She should be held accountable for making the justice system look like a joke. Who knows how many people's constitutional rights this woman has violated. I would bet it's a lot.

Litigant

Comment #: CA54610
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Another woke authoritarian communist California judge that violates the constitutional rights of those unfortunate enough to be forced into her presence. Her sense of justice is as dense as she is. The founding fathers would spit in her face. Disgrace of a judge.

She thinks being born with a vagina qualifies her for the position. DEI hire loser.

Litigant

Comment #: CA54363
Rating:1.0

Comments:
ella odia a los hombres

Litigant

Comment #: CA54312
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Worst judge I have ever had the misfortune of dealing with. She is a feminist activist judge that has no sense of justice.

She belittles men and never gives them a chance to defend themselves during cases. She is lenient on females and gives them the benefit of the doubt.

Anyone who watches her try a case can see that she has a severe bias. She brags about being the first woman to be elected as a superior court judge, but it is clear that she is just a diversity hire that doesn't deserve to be in the position she is in.

She is a mockery to liberty and justice.