"The Robing Room: CA State Judges

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Roger L Lund

Comments

Other

Comment #: CA56162
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
JUDGE L. LUND ALLOWED MY MOTHER & MYSELF, "MISSOURI RESIDENTS," TO BE VICTIMIZED IN HIS COURTROOM AND FINED ME, A MISSOURI RESIDENT $ 165,000,00 FOR AN ACCOUNING THE LYING HAROLD WINDFRED DICKENS III NEVER FILED BEFORE BEING FINED ONE-THOUSAND DOLLARS A "DAY" UNTIL IT WAS FILED. JUDGE LUNK, NEVER ALLOWED DUE PROCESS OF HAVING AN EVIDENTARY HEARING OR A TRIAL AS INDICATED PREVOUSLY. EVEN THOUGH WE WERE NOT IN THE PROBATE COURTS' JURISDICTION. HE RUBBER STAMPED BILLINGS OF WHICH I'VE NEVER SEEN AND ALLOWED THE ANGELIQUE FREIND AND HER HUSBAND DAVID, M. ESQUIBIAS TO REPRESENT HER, "A CONFLICT OF INTEREST" HE IGNORED. LUND VIOLATED OUR RIGHST FROM WHEN HE TOOK OVER THE CASE. MR. DICKENS NEVER DID HIS JOB, AND THE CORRUPTION THAT WENT ON IS INCREDIBLE, WITH SO MANY PREDATORS INVOLVED. TO NAME A FEW ANGELIQUE V. FRIEND, HER HUSBAND DAVID M. EQUIBIAS, LINDSAY NEILSON, AND MANY MORE INVOLED IN PROBATE. THE LAWS SHOULD BE ABOLISHED, AND LUND SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE BENCH. I WONDER WHY HE'S TAKEN OUT 11 MILLION IN LOANS, AND THEY GET PAID OFF QUICKLY. IT'S FUNNY HOW THEY USE THIS PROCESS TO LAUNDER MONEY TAKEN FROM THE ELDERLY, DISABLED AND OTHERS. HE GAVE NO REGARD TO MY MOTHER'S LIVING TRUST, WORKING WITH THE RUBBER STAMPING AND FALSIFIED DOCUMENTS MY MOTHER'S ESTATE AND STEALING MY HOME, WHICH WAS "QUIT CLAIMED" AND RECORED IN 2008. DEPLETING FUNDS FROM ESTATES AND NOT HORORING OUR DEAR PARENTS' WISHES, WHILE VOILATING HER RIGHTS, IS WHAT LUND AND HIS CRONIES ARE ALL ABOUT.

Other

Comment #: CA56139
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Lund is part of [Redacted by Ed.] predatory conservatorships in Ventura County. He rubberstamps all billings by the conservators and attorneys of the conservatees, without looking at the billings. The conservators and lawyers are emptying the life savings of the conservatees for their own financial gain. Why does Lund allow this? [Redacted by Ed.]