"The Robing Room: CA State Judges

Hon. Monica Marlow	See Rating Details
Judge Superior Court
Shasta County	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 3.9 - 3 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: - 0 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Monica Marlow

Comments

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA10599
Rating:2.4

Comments:
This is definitely one of the worst Judges on the bench. She repeatedly ignored the law, showed blatant favoritism to one side over the other, and routinely abused her power. A one rating is generous.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA8884
Rating:1.1

Comments:
In almost 25 years of practice this is one of the worst judges I have ever appeared before in a civil matter. She clearly failed to read the pre-trial briefs or motions and didn't care when this was pointed out to her. Absolutely no clue about the law in our case (statute and case) and when challenged with the law, either ignored it or was adamant she could simply ignore it. Perhaps she was an OK criminal judge,but she is doing an injustice to the civil bench. Our firm will not appear in front of her again.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4510
Rating:8.3

Comments:
She took the time to read the filings/briefs and become familiar with cited cases in a complicated matter.