"The Robing Room: CO State Judges

Hon. Edward D. Bronfin	See Rating Details
District Judge District Court
Denver County 2nd Judicial District	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 10.0 - 1 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 1 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Edward D. Bronfin

Comments

Litigant

Comment #: CO548
Rating:1.0

Comments:
This judge presided over a civil judgement against me - actually, there were no hearings. He granted a summary judgement settlement to a law firm who collects for a thieving, deceitful attorney who stole my assets. Judge Bronfin at least disclosed he socialized with the "debt" collector, but did not recuse himself. Should have.

I was never involved with the case, not a defendant, but when the actual DOC inmate who was, had his judgement overturned on appeal, Mr. 35C Attorney amped up his bill, far exceeding the original agreed-upon $10,000 fee.

The civil judgement for his attorney fees was awarded fraudulently, via summary judgement (no defense allowed) by Bronfin. Dinner-party friends with the collectors. OAR was not interested.

Prosecutor

Comment #: CO405
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
The incestuous nature of our judiciary is on full display with Judge Bronfin and his "mentee." One has to wonder why this man took a trip to San Diego with his "mentee" (who was assigned to him by the Colorado Supreme Court and whose cases he recuses from as claimed by him) to sleep with a "big cat" cub that his mentee's relative was taking care of from the Zoo. Is that really how mentors are supposed to interact with mentees in the judiciary? This is clearly a privileged white man exercising his white privilege with no regard for appearances. And his mentee is learning just how you know NOT what you know is what matters and it is also a big contributing factor to the ABSOLUTE MESS THE U.S. JUDICIARY BRANCH IS IN AMERICA.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CO285
Rating:10.0

Comments:
One of the best judges I ever had the honor of going before.