Hon. Natalie T. Chase See Rating Details
District Judge
District Court
Douglas County
18th Judicial District
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Natalie T. Chase


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CO530
Rating:1.0
Comments:
One of the worst judges to preside over family law cases. Rulings unreasonable, punitive, spiteful. Disrespectful behavior
that went unchecked by other lawyers in the courtroom. Hardly got what she deserved.

Other

Comment #: CO529
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
A public censure in April 2021 included her departure from the bench. Findings of racial bias are hardly scratching the surface of how this judge treated defendants.
Should have lost her BAR license. State Judicial Discipline Commission refused to investigate the outpouring of complaints after her censure became public. She hurt a lot of people and got away with it.

Other

Comment #: CO453
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Inhumane behavior toward litigant with disability, no due process