"The Robing Room: CO State Judges

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Kathleen Janski

Comments

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CO660
Rating:1.0

Comments:
"Judge" Katherine Janski was an appalling example of someone who had no business holding a judicial position. She blatantly violated explicit court rules and was openly biased, often lashing out at unrepresented parties with hostility and condescension. Her behavior was not just unprofessional but unethical, disregarding both legal standards and fairness. Judge Janski’s actions were not only a miscarriage of justice but a flagrant abuse of power. Given her blatant bias and disregard for the rule of law, she did not deserve to be called a judge, and it was a disgrace that she ever remained on the bench.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CO518
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Thankfully following “retirement” of Arapahoe County, CO District Judge Natalie Chase jackass Janski “retired” after another federal section 1983 lawsuit was brought against her!!! She literally allowed an attorney to practice in Small Claims Court by vacating default judgement in favor of pro se litigant AFTER statute of limitations and took over 353 days to issue Small Claims decision which she unlawfully combined with County Court case which attorney failed to follow… Her animus was so obvious she went so far to set appeal bond of $3500 when Denver District JUDGE properly granted same appealing pro se litigant waiver of appeal fees and bonds…. Never produced paid for designated key witness transcript yet alone Small Claims Record to cover and conceal her illegal actions…. Sadly white women jurist “retire” (Chase & Janski) to avoid judicial discipline which unfortunately is closed to The People/Public of Colorado…… Chief Justice Amico takes a “bent blind eye” to “Karen’s”/Klan presiding in Kolorado Kourts (KKK)…