"The Robing Room: CT State Judges

Hon. David P. Gold	See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge District Court
Middlesex County	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 2 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 1 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. David P. Gold

Comments

Litigant

Comment #: CT701
Rating:1.0

Comments:
` Bad! Pursued criminal charges against dad for refusing to drop off kids, age 7, home alone at moms house.called it custodial interference. Forced case to trial with him as judge,tried to throw case but jury acquittal, not guilty, [Redacted by Ed.].

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CT135
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Gold is the prosecution in his court room. Almost as if to suggest the accused is innocent is to defame the police or the judge who signed the arrest warrant. It is us against the accused and the us always wins....only way out of that court alive is through the jury. Don't even pretend there are any other options. If you land in this court room god is even punishing you. There is nothing about rights or justice. It is just us against you and you are toast.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CT134
Rating:1.0

Comments:
He is Bias and is a Prosecuting from the bench - Brenda Hans and Barbra Hoffman are lowest standard clowns at best so he must do their jobs for them... He prosecuted someone many years ago - and the defendant was found not guilty ... this is the same approach he has today. Everyone is guilty, all are guilty until proven innocent - he is slimy dirt bag.