Hon. Karen A. Goodrow See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
District Court
New Haven County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   9.9 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Karen A. Goodrow


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: CT696
Rating:1.0
Comments:
[Redacted by Ed.] Lacked competence in finance, possibly innumerate. Gender biased. Used offensive and false ethnic stereotype in decision. Jumped to conclusions. Poor forensic skills. Findings of fact contrary to all evidence and illogical. Failed to honor stipulation. Nightmare.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CT637
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
very honest judge. Listened to the entire argument in my divorce case and was able to see through the lies that were told by my ex and her attorney.
New Haven needs more like her and needs to weed out the bad apples

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CT394
Rating:9.9
Comments:
smart hard working polite great temperment