"The Robing Room: FL State Judges

Hon. Margaret A. Rosenbaum	See Rating Details
Circuit Court
Miami-Dade County 11th Circuit	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 6.3 - 2 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: - 0 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Margaret A. Rosenbaum

Comments

Other

Comment #: FL3976
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I cant even believe people like this are appointed to our court system. This women is not capable of a making a decision. During my pretrIal she admitted she had vertigo which to me can impair ones function of rational thinking. During the actual trial she did not even let me defend myself. She also claimed she hasn't had a raise in 10 years which is probably the way she doesn't even care about her job and probably way she makes decision based on which side of the bed she woke up.

Other

Comment #: FL3185
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This nut job needs to get a job cutting lawns -- and not close to the courthouse, either. She uses friends of friends for her cases, and is very unprofessional -- she used the phrase "walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, must be a duck" in response to lies made by the respondent (a cop addicted to drugs). This judge has done a number on two of my kids by her rulings, and her friends helped throw this one out of court!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL3170
Rating:2.8

Comments:
I cannot believe that there are not more reports on her. As an officer of the court, I was threatened by my client's husband in her courtroom, and she did not do a thing! She has zero ethics or morals. All she cares about is her lunch break. As lazy as it gets.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL1380
Rating:9.8

Comments:
A delight to appear before; she is always well-prepared and gives both sides the full opportunity to be heard. Very fair and interested in achieving the best legal result for all parties.