Hon. Jack R. St. Arnold See Rating Details

Circuit Court
Pinellas County
6th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.6 - 7 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   3.0 - 7 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Jack R. St. Arnold


Comments


Other

Comment #: FL8843
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
An easy 9

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL8671
Rating:1.3
Comments:
~I for one hope anyone reading this does not select this dishonorable person for any legal services. What an embarrassment he is to this already sick system. He participated in a covert plan without due notice. Diplorable.

Other

Comment #: FL7920
Rating:1.0
Comments:
St. Arnold is the laziest judge I have ever seen. He does not bother to read any evidence from either side in his cases, because he says that he is too busy. He believes lies without any further questioning, therefore he lacks wisdom and discernment as a judge in his decision making. Innocent people are greatly harmed in his courtroom because he does not practice the due diligence that is expected in his position. St. Arnold loves to hear himself talk, but he has little patience for allowing others the opportunity to explain what actually happened. The citizens of this community deserve better. Thankfully, he is termed out on December 31, 2020.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: FL7795
Rating:1.0
Comments:
would not let me talk at my hearing

Prosecutor

Comment #: FL7793
Rating:1.5
Comments:
He ORDERED me to endanger my son and daughter to consent to a contract to repay the states welfare debts witch creates a bonus for him and his staff and my family homeless. that contract i never consented to nor do i own as a man of god. i never signed up to do any business with this corporation nor do i want to. The DOR has NO case for me or contracts signed from me. so how do i owe to be equally in my daughters life as i am in my sons? Parental alienation and perjury my ex committed and this judge is just turning his head and awarding the defendant on false accusations without evidence. restricting natural rights under the color of law. a non positive law title!! STOP THE TYRANNY NOW!! ALL rights RESERVED a man, Jesse Hancock, not the fictitious entity the us frauds us all on by selling are Birth certificates as a bond to take a loan out on you. but no one tells you this anywhere. why is that? cause they are frauds! crooks!

Litigant

Comment #: FL7002
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I had a hearing and I paid $400.oo
to have it. at the hearing, he told me I could not talk and he ruled in the defendants favor without one shred of evidence

Other

Comment #: FL6990
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
HE WOULD NOT LET ME TALK SAT MY OWN
HEARING THATY I PAID $400 to have.
he let the defendants talk but told me I could not talk. he ruled in the defendant's favor with out one shred of
evidence that they could produce.

Litigant

Comment #: FL3809
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge was extremely disrespectful even to my 85 year old mother. can't find anything good to say since he has hurt so many people under his reign as a probate judge. I think he has deep pockets and he won't officiate at any of my future hearings as he is implicated in probate fraud.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL3722
Rating:9.4
Comments:
My interactions with Judge St. Arnold have always been very positive. He is thoughtful and even-handed in his rulings. I have never seen him exhibit any favoritism. He is not vulnerable to flim-flam appeals to sentimentality or arguments not based in the law. It's refreshing to see a judge who is both a scholar and a gentleman.

Prosecutor

Comment #: FL3626
Rating:2.0
Comments:
Embarrassment to the system.

Other

Comment #: FL3496
Rating:10.0
Comments:
This gentleman has a heart of gold

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL3198
Rating:1.1
Comments:
My own experience with this judge made it very clear that he is corrupt and willing to cater to those with connections as a way of securing his position. Intellectually, Judge Jack St. Arnold is plainly lacking. However, far more significant is his lack of respect for the law, and his willingness to violate the rights of parties in order to score points with lawyers that he feels will assist him. He is dishonest, abuses his power and is the sort of man who brings shame to the judicial process.

Other

Comment #: FL2720
Rating:1.0
Comments:
He sets his buddies up with huge fees and enjoys parties and playing it up.Person with big ties, St. Pete. College, Fla. Bars, Guardianship Associations, they are all his groupies and he pays them well. He should be removed!