"The Robing Room: FL State Judges

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Donna M Keim

Comments

Other

Comment #: FL6549
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Absolutely horrendous! This judge is all tied in with a group of female attorneys where she verifies NONE of accusations brought to her attention and had NO problems deciding cases on such! Avoid her at all cost she should be removed.

Litigant

Comment #: FL5282
Rating:3.0

Comments:
Ignored actual harm of financial abuse and abuse of court system being done to children and mother by father in custody case. Easily swayed by smear tactics and assuming what is in print email is true. Threaten to put a mother in jail over missing tax return documents. Leave an abuser and get threatened with jail. Ignored a panic attack in chambers, obvious symptom of past abuse. And no I don't want all of my mental health/personal data in the records of the sunshine state. He can have the kids I will keep my privacy, my kids will understand, but I never will.