"The Robing Room: FL State Judges

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Stasia Warren

Comments

Litigant

Comment #: FL8819
Rating:10.0

Comments:
Judge Warren is often hard to read in the Court room. I thought she was favoring opposing counsel's side during the entire Trial. But she declined to rule that day and spent 2.5 months thoughtfully researching my case. In the end she made the right decision and saw through opposing counsel's smear campaign and realized they had not met their burden of proof. She ruled heavily in my favor and did the right thing not to break up a big loving family of 5 young children. It was a heavily litigated relocation case where 2 of my children would have been separated and relocated to a different State with their bio dad. Very stressful for the better part of a year and those 2.5 months awaiting her Ruling, but in the end we are so grateful she saw through it all and made the right decision to keep the siblings together and the children here in Florida with the rest of their family. Her ruling was thoughtful and compassionate.