"The Robing Room: GA State Judges

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Alexandra Manning

Comments

Litigant

Comment #: GA275
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This judge should be off the bench immediately. She is very biased and hands out restraining orders without evidence. She is very rude and dismissive and will rule based on her opinion alone. She is a danger to the Fulton county constituents.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: GA273
Rating:2.8

Comments:
Determined outcome before the first day of trial ended and didn't listen to any contrary evidence for the next week. Did not understand the case dynamic and was not interested in testimony after her mind was made up. Both attorneys and the GAL knew her decision when Day 1 ended and were right. Confirmation bias plagued her capacity to be open-minded, and she simply liked one party and her attorney better than the other professionals. Drew conclusions for which there was evidence to the contrary. Was condescending and judgmental toward the parties, attorneys , and professional witnesses alike. Unable to see the big picture. Several of the things in her Order are not legally sound, and she was monetarily punitive to the man she did not like. She did not understand the contructs and complexity of how the interactions between the litigants led to the need for court involvement and did not seem to want to. Worst of all, she didn't care about the kids in the case who her decision impacted and will continue to impact for the rest of their lives. Very disappointed in her professionalism and her lack of willingness to listen to all of the evidence with an open mind. Her snide comments were unnecessary and unprofessional. May she find grace and shed her disease of robitis because she is not very intelligent and seems to only like the power to make decisions but forgets that they affect real lives, whehter she likes the people involoved in the case or not. If magistrate judges were elected, she would not be in the position of power she is in because she caused harm not only to the kids in the case but to professionals, parents, and attorneys. Thankfully she was removed from hearing family law and DV cases recently. Too bad that all the cases she already heard and ruled unfairly without considering all of the evidence can't be retried by a judge who cares about families in the court system.