"The Robing Room: ID State Judges

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Robert L. Jackson

Comments

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: ID260
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge Jackson is bias against women and children. Doesn't abide by best interest laws or child's wishes. Denied a protection order with substantiated evidence of second degree burns on a child. Criminally charged a mother for protecting a child against a man charged w strangulation and assault. Didn't allow evidence of second degree burns or allow mother to defend child. Rewarded a child abuser with more time and took protective parents time away against the child's wishes. Awarded abuser w special times and days that wasn't allowed for other parent. Forcing protective parent to pay abusers attorney bill. Was promised child support, Jackson denied that as well. Jackson did not protect this child. Criminally charged a mother with ridiculous over charges when mom had no prior offenses or any trouble w law ever. Idaho statutes clearly say a parent had the right to keep the child away from harm and Jackson didn't adhere to that law either. Child abuser only charged w disturbing the capeace for second degree burns, while mother got 2 years supervised probation a week of work crew and a $2000 fine, threatened w jail time for protecting my son because this judge refused to protect a child from a child abuser and women abusers, father has extensive history of domestic violence and Jackson Didn't consider any of this as evidence. Showed clear bias, legal abuse. Jackson needs investigation into how he handles child abuse as I see he has no experience in this field so why is he a family court judge??? He blatantly did not follow laws of Idaho on abuse.