"The Robing Room: IL State Judges

Hon. Kathleen Ann Panozzo	See Rating Details
Associate Judge Circuit Court
Cook County Cook Judicial Circuit	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 1.1 - 2 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 2 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Kathleen Ann Panozzo

Comments

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: IL2350
Rating:1.0

Comments:
This judge allowed the defendants lawyer to write up the court order, then she signed it. The defendant didn’t abide by the order and she still ruled for him. This was a small claims case in which I believe her and the lawyer had some sort of relationship. She wouldn’t even look at anything I had to support my case. I think she was very unfair and unjust.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: IL757
Rating:1.3

Comments:
This judge clearly has no idea what constitutes right and wrong. I watched her give custody of a minor child to a mother who stated before she was held at a mental institute, and that she would harm her son and herself just to get back at the father. She still returned custody of the child to the mother, after the mother had stated the child has lived with him from birth and hardly ever saw the mother.

Other

Comment #: IL650
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge panozzo acted without jurisdiction when she allegedly conspired with her Alsip police friends to unlawfully set me up as a favor for her neighbor, and my ex employer. You may read more about it at http://crookcounty.peperonity.com

Litigant

Comment #: IL566
Rating:1.0

Comments:
As a victim of domestic abuse, I have seen her get mad at victims for dropping charges against their abusers, yet let the attacker get off due to a "technicality" & let his criminal defense attorney argue a family law case INSTEAD of the criminal case that should have been presented!!!