Hon. Frances C. Gull See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Criminal Court
Allen County
7
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 5 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Frances C. Gull


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: IN185
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Release the documents judge. Why do you think you are above the law? You are a sick bitch and I hope your god takes you very soon. Fuck you.

Other

Comment #: IN184
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She's very bais during the trial of Richard Allen's trial and stopping the defens attorney for presenting evidence in the trial and always biased and and she was friends with Prosecutor Nick McLean and not letting the jury see all the evidence that she denied the defense on presenting the defense case judge Gull had done everything she could do against the defense to see that that Richard Allen doesn't get a fair trial she needs to removed from the bench of being in another court judge Richard Allen's fifth amendment rights were not given to him

Other

Comment #: IN183
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Gull has showed extreme bias in the Richard Allen trial. She allowed a retrial detainee to be held is solitary confinement for 13 months in a PRISON. She refused to allow Richard Allen a fair trial. She tied the defenses hands where they couldn’t properly defend Richard. Worst judge ever. And she be removed from being a judge and taking off the cases in court

Other

Comment #: IN182
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This person shows such bias, has no respect for the law or Constitution, and shouldn't even be a judge or anything else that has to do with law. I've been appalled watching some of her cases play out... It's like something from the twilight zone, just unbelievable

Other

Comment #: IN181
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Gull has showed extreme bias in the Richard Allen trial. She allowed a retrial detainee to be held is solitary confinement for 13 months in a PRISON. She refused to allow Richard Allen a fair trial. She tied the defenses hands where they couldn’t properly defend Richard. Worst judge ever.

Other

Comment #: IN180
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Gull should be ashamed at how she has aided and abetted the State in violating the Constitutional Rights of a citizen of the United States of America under cover of darkness.

Other

Comment #: IN179
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
She's very bais during the trial of Richard Allen's trial and stopping the defens attorney for presenting evidence in the trial and always biased and and she was friends with Prosecutor Nick McLean and not letting the jury see all the evidence that she denied the defense on presenting the defense case judge Gull had done everything she could do against the defense to see that that Richard Allen doesn't get a fair trial she needs to removed from the bench of being in another court judge Richard Allen's fifth amendment rights were not given to him during his tria

Other

Comment #: IN178
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
She's very bais during the trial of Richard Allen's trial and stopping the defens attorney for presenting evidence in the trial and always biased and and she was friends with Prosecutor Nick McLean and not letting the jury see all the evidence that she denied the defense on presenting the defense case judge Gull had done everything she could do against the defense to see that that Richard Allen doesn't get a fair trial she needs to removed from the bench of being in another court judge Richard Allen's fifth amendment rights were not given to him during his trial

Other

Comment #: IN173
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Extreme bias in favour of prosecution. No interest in being an impartial guardian of justice and in my view she has no place on the bench. Everyone should be scared in her court.

Other

Comment #: IN167
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Shows EXTREME bias in favor of the prosecution. She should not be on any bench. Reference: Delphi, Richard Allen-Defendant