"The Robing Room: IN State Judges

Hon. Frances C. Gull	See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge Criminal Court
Allen County 7	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: - 0 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 2 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Frances C. Gull

Comments

Other

Comment #: IN186
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Gull dud a dis service to everyone involved in the Richard Allen trial. She was so biese and favored the state by not allowing the defense to do their job and present the evadance to prove Richard innocents. He did not get a fair trial. Everyone in this case that had a hand in the loss of the interviews and the evidence of the true time line that was not turned over to the court and those that lied under oth to get warrants should all be held accountable including judge Gull. This is a very sad representation of the state of Indiana and how we provide justice to those that are sippose to be innocent until proven guilty. He was made out to be guilty to the public when they all decided to not go after the real killers involving the pagans, libbys sister kelsi and the patties. They covered it all up because it was too big for that town to handle.
Judge i hope you get your judgement you deserve on your judgment day with God.This would be your time to make things right you won't get a second judgment day with God.

Other

Comment #: IN179
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
She's very bais during the trial of Richard Allen's trial and stopping the defens attorney for presenting evidence in the trial and always biased and and she was friends with Prosecutor Nick McLean and not letting the jury see all the evidence that she denied the defense on presenting the defense case judge Gull had done everything she could do against the defense to see that that Richard Allen doesn't get a fair trial she needs to removed from the bench of being in another court judge Richard Allen's fifth amendment rights were not given to him during his tria

Other

Comment #: IN173
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Extreme bias in favour of prosecution. No interest in being an impartial guardian of justice and in my view she has no place on the bench. Everyone should be scared in her court.

Other

Comment #: IN167
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Shows EXTREME bias in favor of the prosecution. She should not be on any bench. Reference: Delphi, Richard Allen-Defendant