Home
FAQs
Contact
Privacy Notice
Legal Notice
Hon. Michael Gibbens
See Rating Details
District Court Judge
District
Leavenworth County
1st
See Comments
Attorney Average Rating:
-
0
rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:
-
0
rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:
Add your own rating
E-Mail Address (
will not be displayed
)
*
*
Confirm E-mail Address
*
*
*
Zip
Occupation
Criminal Defense Lawyer
Prosecutor
Civil Litigation - Govt.
Civil Litigation - Private
Probation or Pretrial Officer
Court Staff
Litigant
Other
Add a comment only
Only items marked with (
*
) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.
General Rating Criteria
Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)
Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)
Comments
Please type what you see below:
Not an even number!
What others have said about
Hon. Michael Gibbens
Comments
Prosecutor
Comment #: KS31
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
To call minors “aggressors” is to ignore the law. They are considered below the age of consent for a reason — they are too young to exhibit appropriate judgment. This is why the responsibility and burden to act appropriately lies solely with the adult in the situation. The law does not permit the judge to consider them to be aggressors - only victims. This judge should not be in the bench. What a showing of gross incompetence. Absolutely disgusting.
Other
Comment #: KS30
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This “judge” should be disrobed and disbarred. To call a 13 and 14 year old the “aggressors” in a sexual act with a 67 year old man is wrong. Legally, neither of the VICTIMS in the Soden case could even consent to such an act so giving this sexual predator a lighter sentence based on this is unconscionable.
Other
Comment #: KS29
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Disgusted that a judge would call a child the "aggressor". He should be removed
Other
Comment #: KS28
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
What is wrong with this man?
Incompetence is appalling
Other
Comment #: KS27
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
There is a legal age of consent as well as minimum sentencing guidelines for a reason, a the Soden case is exactly that reason.
These 13- and 14-year-old girls are CHILDREN. I pray to God he doesn’t have daughters, but if so, I’d be interested to know if he thinks it would be fine for a 67-year-old man to sexually assault his 13-year-old daughter, you know, if she were the AGGRESSOR.
Other
Comment #: KS26
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This so called judge needs to be removed. If he thinks a 13-year-old child is the aggressor when an adult man has sex with her, he shows appalling judgment.
Other
Comment #: KS25
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Mr. Gibbens seems to be under the impression that 15 year olds girls can be the ‘aggressor’ in sexual abuse cases involving 67 year old men, and doles out sentences accordingly.
I’m an American citizen, and I think this is criminal. Are these the sort of judicious decisions we are expected to accept? Are these the sort of people who are charged with protecting our communities?
Shame on you, Mr. Gibbens. If it were up to me, you’d be out of a job you obviously were never qualified for.
This is not America. This is shameful.