Hon. Earl W. Bartgis, Jr. See Rating Details
District Judge
Circuit Court
Frederick County
6th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   9.3 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Earl W. Bartgis, Jr.


Comments


Other

Comment #: MD9397
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Extremely bias towards police officers, believes they are doing "the Lord's work". Not surprising based on the Governor who appointed him to the bench.

Other

Comment #: MD5721
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Horrible Judge as he perpetrates fraud for auto accidents. No damage to the woman's vehicle but gave her everything plus 6,000 because she was good looking. Must be nice to pay all that insurance because Judges think the auto insurance company are the ones paying the bill when in fact it is the consumer. Thanks for nothing bartgis!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD3821
Rating:9.3
Comments:
A very good District Court judge and one who will likely one day be a very good Circuit Court judge.