"The Robing Room: MA State Judges

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Beverly J. Cannone

Comments

Other

Comment #: MA1106
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
1
She is biased and has no business being a judge.

Other

Comment #: MA1105
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Mirror, mirror, on the wall, who's the unfairest of them all?

I've been observing trials for thirty plus years, and I'm appalled at the biasness Judge Beverly Cannone openly demonstrates in her courtroom towards Karen Read and her amazing team. She continues to "allow" the Norfolk County prosecution team to rob Karen Read of not only one fair trial, but now two. As the re-prosecution, I mean, re-persecution of Karen Read begins, I am hopeful that someone holds her accountable, rather than continuing to just look the other away.

May God save the Commonwealth of Massachusetts from Judge Beverly J. Cannone!

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA1104
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge Beverly Cannone: A Serious Threat to Fair Trials

As a criminal defense attorney, I have seen my fair share of difficult judges, but Judge Beverly Cannone’s handling of the Karen Read trial is one of the most egregious displays of judicial bias I have ever witnessed. Her rulings overwhelmingly favor the prosecution, suppressing defense arguments and barring key evidence that could challenge the state’s case. Rather than acting as a neutral arbiter, she appears determined to steer the trial toward a predetermined outcome.

Her evidentiary decisions are inconsistent at best and outright prejudicial at worst. She has actively curtailed the defense’s ability to challenge the prosecution’s witnesses while allowing the state to present questionable testimony with little scrutiny. This is not how a fair trial is supposed to function. The judge’s job is to ensure due process, not to tip the scales in favor of conviction.

Judge Cannone’s conduct in this trial undermines public trust in the judiciary and erodes the foundational principles of our legal system. When a judge prioritizes protecting the state’s case over ensuring a defendant’s rights, justice becomes impossible. Anyone facing a serious criminal charge in her courtroom should be deeply concerned about whether they will receive a fair trial.

Her courtroom is not a forum for justice—it is a prosecution-friendly arena where due process is little more than an inconvenience. Judges like Beverly Cannone do lasting damage to the integrity of the legal system and have no place on the bench.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA1103
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Stop deleting these reviews

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA1102
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge Beverly Cannone’s Courtroom is a Hostile Environment for Justice

As a criminal defense attorney, I am appalled by Judge Beverly Cannone’s handling of the Karen Read trial. Her blatant favoritism toward the prosecution is on full display, and it has severely compromised the fairness of this proceeding. From the outset, she has issued rulings that suppress exculpatory evidence, limit critical defense arguments, and obstruct cross-examination of key witnesses—all to the benefit of the Commonwealth.

Her courtroom demeanor toward the defense is adversarial, while she extends every courtesy to the prosecution. This is not the behavior of an impartial judge; it is the behavior of someone intent on securing a conviction rather than ensuring justice. Her refusal to allow key expert testimony and her selective application of evidentiary rules make it clear that she is not interested in a fair trial—only in protecting the state’s case.

Judges are supposed to be the gatekeepers of justice, but Judge Cannone has demonstrated that she is more concerned with controlling the narrative than with the truth. Her actions in this trial are a disgrace to the legal profession and an embarrassment to the judiciary. She is unfit to preside over any case where fundamental rights are at stake.

For anyone who believes in due process and the right to a fair trial, Judge Cannone’s courtroom is a chilling reminder of what happens when the scales of justice are tipped in favor of the state.

Other

Comment #: MA1101
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge Beverly Cannone – A Disgrace to the Bench

Judge Beverly Cannone’s handling of the Karen Read trial is nothing short of a disgrace. From the start, she has shown blatant bias in favor of the prosecution, allowing them every advantage while constantly undermining the defense. Her rulings are inconsistent, arbitrary, and seem designed to obstruct any evidence that challenges the state’s shaky narrative.

She has repeatedly shut down critical defense arguments while giving the prosecution free rein, making it painfully clear that fairness is not a priority in her courtroom. Her demeanor toward defense counsel is dismissive, and she seems more interested in protecting the prosecution’s case than ensuring justice is served.

This trial should be about uncovering the truth, but under Judge Cannone’s oversight, it has become a spectacle of judicial misconduct. Her refusal to allow key witnesses and evidence that could exonerate Karen Read is alarming. This is not what justice looks like.

Anyone who values an impartial and fair judiciary should be deeply concerned about Judge Cannone’s actions in this case. She is unfit for the bench and has done irreparable damage to public trust in the legal system.

Other

Comment #: MA1100
Rating:1.0

Comments:
This website is NOT transparent!!! THEY REMOVE REVIEWS DAILY!!!!

Other

Comment #: MA1099
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Biased, sorry excuse for a judge. Prosecution leaning, horrid . Needs removed from the bench.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA1098
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge Beverly Cannone’s handling of the Karen Read trial continues to raise serious concerns about fairness and judicial integrity. Her courtroom decisions consistently favor the prosecution, creating a one-sided trial that undermines the very concept of due process. From the outset, Cannone has demonstrated a troubling pattern of suppressing defense arguments, disregarding key evidence, and allowing blatant misconduct by the prosecution to go unchecked.

One of the most alarming aspects of Cannone’s conduct is her refusal to allow critical exculpatory evidence that contradicts the state’s narrative. She has actively blocked expert testimony and crucial witness statements that could exonerate Read, while permitting the prosecution to present speculative and questionable evidence. This selective gatekeeping suggests an agenda rather than an impartial application of the law.

Her bias extends beyond rulings; it is evident in her demeanor and control of the courtroom. She frequently interrupts Read’s defense team, cutting off their arguments and diminishing their ability to challenge the prosecution’s case. Meanwhile, she grants the prosecution wide latitude, allowing them to make misleading claims and objections without scrutiny. The double standard is impossible to ignore.

Furthermore, Cannone has allowed law enforcement figures involved in the case to escape scrutiny, even in the face of clear evidence of investigative corruption. Rather than ensuring a fair trial, she appears to be protecting those with institutional power, at the expense of a defendant facing life-altering consequences.

The Karen Read trial should have been about uncovering the truth, but under Cannone’s oversight, it has become a mockery of justice. Her actions erode public trust in the legal system and demonstrate why judicial oversight is desperately needed. A judge who cannot uphold the principles of impartiality and fairness has no place on the bench.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA1097
Rating:1.0

Comments:
ROBING ROOM ERASES REVIEWS!!! SHAME ON THEM!!!!

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA1096
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Terrible Judge. Needs removed from this bench.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA1095
Rating:1.0

Comments:
STOP DELETING REVIEWS !!!!!!

Judge Beverly Cannone's handling of the Karen Read trial has been nothing short of disgraceful. Her blatant bias in favor of the prosecution has tainted the proceedings, raising serious concerns about fairness and judicial integrity. Time and again, Cannone has ruled against Read’s defense on crucial matters, suppressing evidence that could expose police corruption while allowing the prosecution to present a deeply flawed case.

One of the most egregious examples of Cannone's misconduct is her refusal to admit exculpatory evidence that directly contradicts the prosecution’s narrative. Instead, she has repeatedly sided with law enforcement, despite overwhelming indications of investigative misconduct, including tampered evidence and witness intimidation. Her decisions have handcuffed the defense, preventing them from fully presenting their case to the jury.

Cannone's courtroom demeanor further demonstrates her partiality. She frequently interrupts Read’s attorneys while giving free rein to the prosecution, allowing them to make inflammatory statements unchecked. Her dismissive attitude toward legitimate defense arguments and her willingness to accommodate the prosecution’s every request make it clear where her allegiances lie.

This trial was supposed to be about justice for John O’Keefe, yet Cannone has turned it into a rigged spectacle that shields the real perpetrators. Her rulings have undermined public trust in the judiciary and reinforced the perception that the system protects its own at the expense of truth and accountability. Massachusetts deserves better than a judge who bends the law to serve the interests of the powerful. Cannone's actions in this case should be scrutinized by judicial oversight bodies, and she must be held accountable for her blatant disregard for fairness.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA1094
Rating:1.0

Comments:
DO NOT ERASE THIS REVIEW.

Judge Beverly Cannone’s handling of the Karen Read trial has exposed deep concerns about her ability to oversee a fair and impartial courtroom. From the outset, her rulings have overwhelmingly favored the prosecution, disregarding defense motions and failing to hold law enforcement accountable for glaring inconsistencies and potential misconduct.

Her refusal to grant key evidentiary hearings, along with her dismissive attitude toward legitimate defense concerns, raises serious questions about judicial bias. Instead of ensuring a level playing field, she has actively hindered the defense’s ability to present a full and fair case.

Her courtroom demeanor is another issue—often impatient, visibly irritated with the defense, and far too accommodating to the prosecution. This is not the behavior of an impartial judge but of one who appears to have already made up her mind.

The Karen Read case has brought national scrutiny to Massachusetts courts, and Cannone’s conduct is a prime example of why public trust in the judiciary continues to erode. Justice cannot exist when a judge operates as an extension of the prosecution rather than an impartial arbiter of the law.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA1093
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge Beverly Cannone’s handling of criminal cases raises serious concerns regarding impartiality, judicial temperament, and due process. Repeatedly, she demonstrates a clear bias in favor of the prosecution, making fair trials nearly impossible for defendants.

Her courtroom demeanor is hostile toward defense counsel, often cutting off arguments, dismissing valid motions without proper consideration, and allowing the prosecution to overreach without consequence. She disregards key evidentiary challenges and appears to have little interest in ensuring that defendants receive a fair and balanced hearing.

Her rulings consistently favor law enforcement, even in cases where misconduct is evident. Instead of holding officers accountable for questionable testimony or procedural violations, she enables prosecutorial overreach by shutting down defense objections and limiting cross-examinations.

Perhaps most troubling is her lack of transparency in decision-making. Rulings often come across as predetermined rather than carefully considered. Defendants who appear before her frequently leave with the sense that their fate was sealed before arguments even began.

Justice requires fairness, balance, and respect for the rights of all parties. Unfortunately, Judge Cannone’s track record suggests she prioritizes expediency and prosecutorial interests over the fundamental principles of due process.

Defense attorneys should be prepared for an uphill battle in her courtroom.

Other

Comment #: MA1092
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Biased. Can’t take a single iota of criticism. Frightening, truly frightening for all the people of Canton.

Other

Comment #: MA1091
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
DO NOT DELETED MY OPINION OF JUDGE BEVERLY CANNONE AS THIS IS A PUBLIC FORM FOR THE PUBLIC TO VOICE THEIR OPINION OF A JUDGE,IF YOU OR THE NAMED JUDGE DOESN'T LIKE THE PUBLICS OPINION OF THEM THEN THEY SHOULD CONSIDER STEPPING DOWN OR CHANGE THEIR BEHAVIOR
We are now into picking the jury in the Karen Read trail and Judge Cannone stated with lying to the potential jurors.
Her instruction to the potential jury was,There are people advocating for oneside or the other without seeing any evidence,that's a down right lie, There has already been one trial so the people that are advocating for oneside or the other have already seen the evidence in the first trial.Plus she is really showing her biased again Karen's lawyer in this second trial.

Other

Comment #: MA1090
Rating:1.0

Comments:
This judge appears to be very biased. I often wonder how she was at one time defended cases. She seems to constantly put her thumb on the scale, its almost as if she really doesnt beleive that a person is actually innocent until and unless proven guilty.

Other

Comment #: MA1089
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Unbelievably corrupt and biased. All of Massachusetts is ashamed and terrified that this is what our justice system looks like.

Other

Comment #: MA1085
Rating:1.0

Comments:
STOP DELETING ALL THE COMMENTS THAT THE US CITIZENS ARE WRITING AS THIS IS VOIDING OUR FREEDOM OF SPEECH!! THAT IS AGAINST THE LAW !!
THIS WEBSITE STATES THIS IS WHEREYOU CAN LEAVES COMMENTS AS IT STATES “WHERE JUDGES ARE JUDGED”!!! DOES BIASED, DIRTYCANNONE HAVE CONNECTIONS ON THIS SITE ALSO TO DELETE CITIZEN'S COMMENTS?!!!! CANNONE HAS MASSACHUSETTS AND MANY OTHER STATES EVEN COUNTRIES DISGUSTED WITH HER BIAS, DISRESPECTFUL, RUDE, CHANGING THINGS TO HER LIKING, UNFAIR, HATE HER PANTING ABD BREATHING HEAVY (DISGUSTING HUMAN SHE IS)

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA1084
Rating:9.1

Comments:
Excellent judge, generally. If anything, she favors the defense. But great temperament .

Other

Comment #: MA1081
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Worst Bias I have ever witnessed in a judge. She needs to be held accountable for obvious inconsistencies in her rulings. She heavily favors the prosecution and makes it nearly impossible for the defense to get a free trial.

Other

Comment #: MA1075
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Stop deleting these reviews!!!!!!!!!

Other

Comment #: MA1071
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Absolutely disgusted by this "judge"
And how this is so blatantly done WITH THE WORLD WATCHING. I don't even know what to say at this point. Karen Read has Absolutely no chance at a fair ANYTHING with this judge/prosecution

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA1044
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Stop deleting these factual reviews.If Judge Beverly Cannone wishes to have good reviews, she should be ethical.

Litigant

Comment #: MA1033
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Extremely pro-prosecution with a blatant disregard for fairness or defendants rights. If she has an agenda, Constitutional rights be damned.

Other

Comment #: MA1022
Rating:3.0

Comments:
Disrespectful, biased , only nice to prosecutors, the prosecutor is lying right to her face and she turns her cheek. Sighs. Won’t let defense lawyers have extra time. Inconsistent rulings , CW vs Read her ruling on Her grave concerns was totally BS Brennan lied to her not Jackson team! Should have dismissed. The Inverted video should have been a grave concern and she looked the other way! Should have recused herself. Shame the on her, she was a defense attorney. And now kissing Morriseys butt! Corruption in Norfolk County is on display , she should retire

Other

Comment #: MA1021
Rating:3.0

Comments:
Cannone's behavior exhibits a similar pattern to that of Judge Maria Lopez. Disrespect for defendant(s), families, jurors, attorneys, general public. Placed herself on the CW vs. Read case though has generational ties to the family of DA Michael Morrissey (both of Quincy, family members worked together). Has single handedly significantly reduced confidence in the justice system in Massachusetts. States she had "grave concerns" and dismissed court against Defense attorneys when Prosecutor made unvetted, untrue statements about their practices.
https://massbar.org/publications/lawyers-journal/lawyers-journal-article/lawyers-journal-2003-july/after-lopez-

Other

Comment #: MA1020
Rating:1.0

Comments:
I work in the oncology field at Good Samaritan Hospital in NY. I’ve always been interested in watching court cases, I have watched many over the years. Well, I am not an attorney. The outright bias of this judge is just astounding. It could not be any more obvious. If there was ever a time to get the reputation back it’s now. The amount of corruption that seems to permeate the Karen Read case is staggering.

Other

Comment #: MA995
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I admit that this is my second review. I would just like to add that there is an overwhelming "appearance of impropriety" with Judge Cannone. Not all reviews live up to the required standard of this site, and I understand why they would be removed, however they do speak to the "appearance of impropriety" as perceived by a large majority of the public. Not only are laypeople viewing her actions as questionable, but numerous lawyers have spoken out in public and shared the public's view that something is amiss when it comes to impartiality and unbiased behavior befitting of a judge. There is no other place for us to express our concern. It is a perception that is backed by many people, whether they express themselves with intelligence and detailed, law-based reviews or not. We are concerned.

Other

Comment #: MA992
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Do NOT DELETE this review. This is ridiculous that the public cannot trust this website that rates judges to be honest.

Judge Beverly Cannone’s handling of the Karen Read trial has raised significant concerns regarding judicial fairness, bias, and ethical integrity. From pre-trial rulings to courtroom conduct, her decisions have repeatedly appeared to favor the prosecution, casting doubt on the impartiality of the judicial process.

Pre-Trial Issues and Questionable Rulings

1. Denial of Key Evidence for the Defense
One of the most alarming aspects of Judge Cannone’s handling of the case has been her rulings on evidence. The defense has repeatedly struggled to obtain crucial discovery materials, including police communications and forensic reports that could support Karen Read’s claims. Restrictions on evidence that might undermine the prosecution’s narrative create an unfair playing field and raise questions about due process.

2. Bias Toward the Prosecution
Throughout the proceedings, Judge Cannone has often ruled in favor of the prosecution while limiting the defense’s ability to present exculpatory evidence. The denial of key defense motions while readily accepting the prosecution’s arguments gives the appearance of partiality, which is especially concerning in a case with significant public and legal interest.

Courtroom Conduct and Procedural Concerns

1. Gag Orders and Media Manipulation
Judge Cannone’s handling of media access and public statements has also been problematic. She has issued rulings that limit the defense’s ability to discuss the case while allowing leaks and narratives from the prosecution to shape public perception. This selective restriction on free speech harms the transparency of the legal process.

2. Handling of Witness Testimonies
Witness testimonies have also been a focal point of controversy. Reports suggest that witnesses whose statements contradict the prosecution’s theory have faced significant hurdles, with some not being allowed to testify or being subjected to excessive scrutiny. In contrast, testimonies that align with the prosecution’s arguments have been given wide latitude.

Public Trust and the Question of Judicial Integrity

Judge Cannone’s conduct in this case has contributed to growing public distrust in the legal system. With mounting evidence of potential judicial misconduct, including the apparent shielding of law enforcement personnel and influential figures from scrutiny, there is a legitimate concern that justice is being obstructed rather than served.

Given the gravity of these issues, calls for accountability and oversight regarding Judge Cannone’s decisions are both warranted and necessary. This trial serves as a pivotal example of why judicial transparency and fairness must be at the forefront of legal proceedings, particularly in high-profile cases where the stakes are extraordinarily high.

Judge Beverly Cannone’s management of the Karen Read trial has been marred by rulings that suggest prosecutorial favoritism, restrictions on the defense, and procedural inconsistencies that undermine confidence in the judicial process. These concerns highlight the urgent need for judicial reform to prevent similar miscarriages of justice in the future.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA978
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Do NOT erase any portion of this review!!

Judge Beverly Cannone’s Conduct Raises Serious Ethical Concerns!!!

Judge Beverly Cannone has repeatedly demonstrated conduct that violates key judicial canons meant to ensure fairness, impartiality, and integrity in the courtroom. Her handling of cases suggests a pattern of bias, lack of transparency, and failure to uphold the basic tenets of judicial ethics.

Violations of Judicial Canons:

1. Canon 1 – Upholding the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary

A judge must ensure public confidence in the integrity of the judiciary. However, Judge Cannone’s rulings and courtroom behavior have led to widespread complaints, raising serious concerns about her ability to remain neutral and fair.

2. Canon 2 – Avoiding Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety

Rather than maintaining impartiality, she has demonstrated favoritism in cases, often disregarding evidence or silencing parties who challenge her authority. This fosters the perception that justice in her courtroom is not applied equally.

3. Canon 3 – Performing Duties Impartially and Diligently

Judge Cannone has failed to provide fair hearings, frequently interrupting litigants and making decisions that seem predetermined rather than based on case facts and law. Reports suggest she disregards due process, an essential judicial responsibility.

4. Canon 4 – Conducting Extrajudicial Activities to Minimize Conflicts of Interest

The public has raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest in cases she presides over, further eroding trust in her ability to make unbiased rulings.

Her reputation among litigants, attorneys, and even colleagues has suffered due to these repeated ethical lapses. Judicial accountability is essential, and the overwhelming number of complaints against her should not be ignored. Judges should be held to the highest standard, and when they fail, they must be called out and investigated.

If you have had a negative experience in her courtroom, I encourage you to document it and file a formal complaint. Judicial integrity must be preserved, and judges like Beverly Cannone must be held accountable for failing to uphold their sworn duties.

Other

Comment #: MA975
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge Cannone has demonstrated gravely concerning levels of bias and unprofessionalism in her handling of the Karen Read case. From audibly sighing as though she has more important places to be to undressing defense experts with her eyes. She does not like the defense lawyers and it’s obvious. What kind of a judge allows a screenshot of a text message to be admitted as evidence in a murder trial?! What kind of a judge doesn’t care if video evidence is clearly edited or hidden altogether? Why can non-medical doctors testify as to causation of an injury…only for the prosecution? I’d call her a joke but nothing’s funny about the way she runs her court room.

Other

Comment #: MA973
Rating:1.0

Comments:
This judge’s actions are damaging public trust in the justice system.

Her lack of evidentiary hearings regarding multiple Brady violations and jury tampering. She stated information in her ruling on the motion to dismiss as facts or as “I don’t know why proctor withheld the videos”. Judge CANNONE, you know how we find out? We call an evidentiary hearing and flesh it out, along with who knew what when. My jaw hit the floor reading her ruling on the motion to dismiss. I mean I knew she was going to deny it, but did she even read it in its entirety before she signed her name to the bottom. She contradicts herself multiple times. But I guess I shouldn’t have expected anything less. First we need a
Medical doctor to look at injuries. Now we have a dog behavioral scientist that can take the stand - without a hearing. After the doctor for the defendant was subject to multiple hearings followed by “a close call” on her ability to testify.

I have tried to say that she is being fair, but this reason above made me lose it.

Instead of actual legit questions, she basically refers back to “Because I said so” (or mostly I am the gate keeper and have discretion). I believe she falls back on this because clearly the case law does not back up her actions.

Other

Comment #: MA959
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Shame on Beverly Cannone. She should have recused herself from the get go on the Karen Read case. There is clearly evidence that she KNOWS many of the people that are DIRECTLY involved. I sincerely hope others will be treated more fairly. What she says and what she does do not square, one bit! I also think she and her pal Morrissey should be investigated. Her "bedside manner" with her sighs and constant interruptions of the defense when she does no such thing to the prosecution is so obvious. Isn't there a code of ethics or governing body that can step in? This does not look for feel like the American justice system that I know. Good Ole Biased Bev, hope you can sleep at night. Actually, I don't but you must exhausted after your 5 hour days in court (11am starts, etc.)

Other

Comment #: MA952
Rating:1.0

Comments:
The Commonwealth lies straight to her face, and she let's them walk all over her. She takes their word as "truth", and DOES NOT seek the real TRUTH.

Beverly Cannone appears to be to corrupt just like the Norfolk DA.

Other

Comment #: MA948
Rating:1.0

Comments:
I’m a trail watcher and I do have to say that watching this case ( Karen Read ) I can’t believe the open Bias and the way she treats the defense versus the CW the openness and the down right blatantly way she speaks to defense is very unprofessional and makes her look like a very ignorant judge of the law. She even leads the CW when she thinks the she be objecting to something by asking them if they want to object, I have never ever seen anything like her and her actions. She should NOT be sitting on this trial it seems like she has something personal in this trial and she should be thrown off. They have asked her a few times and she has refused. Someone really needs to look into this judge and the way she has handled this trial

Other

Comment #: MA943
Rating:1.0

Comments:
It’s clear that many people are deeply frustrated with how the Karen Read case is being handled. From the judge’s blatant bias to the unequal treatment of defense and prosecution, this trial has been anything but fair. The refusal to recuse despite personal connections, the constant interruptions and disrespect toward the defense, and the clear favoritism toward the Commonwealth—this is not how justice is supposed to work.

The judicial system is meant to uphold fairness, not to protect those in power at the expense of a defendant’s rights. Every ruling, every objection sustained before it’s even fully spoken, and every roadblock placed in front of the defense further proves that this judge has no intention of allowing a fair trial. If this is what our justice system has become, then we should all be asking: where are the checks and balances? Who will step in to stop this?

This case is being watched across the country and beyond, and the message it’s sending is dangerous—justice is only for those with the right connections. This judge has made it clear she is not interested in truth, only in controlling the outcome. She should have stepped down long ago. Instead, she continues to disgrace the bench. If there is any integrity left in our system, she must be removed.

Other

Comment #: MA935
Rating:1.0

Comments:
As someone closely following the Karen Read trial, I am deeply disturbed by Judge Beverly Cannone’s blatant mishandling of this case. Her rulings, courtroom demeanor, and consistent bias toward the prosecution have turned what should be a fair and just proceeding into a travesty of justice.

1. Bias in Favor of the Prosecution
From the start, Judge Cannone has shown a clear and troubling bias toward the prosecution. She has consistently ruled against the defense on critical motions while giving the prosecution free rein, even when their arguments lack legal merit. She has also allowed the state to introduce questionable evidence while restricting the defense’s ability to challenge it.

2. Suppression of Exculpatory Evidence
Judge Cannone has repeatedly prevented the defense from presenting crucial exculpatory evidence, making it nearly impossible for Karen Read to receive a fair trial. Key evidence that contradicts the prosecution’s narrative has been downplayed, delayed, or outright excluded, raising serious concerns about judicial misconduct and obstruction of justice.

3. Unfair Handling of Witness Testimony
Witness testimony should be handled with neutrality, yet Judge Cannone has consistently given the prosecution’s witnesses preferential treatment. Defense witnesses face excessive scrutiny, objections are sustained against them at an alarming rate, and cross-examinations that could expose inconsistencies in the prosecution’s case are repeatedly shut down.

4. Failure to Address Corruption Allegations
The Karen Read case is riddled with serious allegations of police and prosecutorial misconduct, including tampered evidence and false statements. A fair and competent judge would ensure that these issues are properly examined. Judge Cannone, however, has ignored these concerns entirely, effectively shielding those accused of corruption from accountability.

5. Manipulation of Jury Instructions
Jury instructions are one of the most critical aspects of a fair trial. In this case, Judge Cannone’s instructions have been vague, misleading, and skewed in a way that favors the prosecution. Instead of ensuring the jury understands the reasonable doubt standard and the flaws in the state’s case, she appears intent on guiding them toward a conviction.

6. Denial of Defense Motions
The defense has filed multiple motions to dismiss unreliable evidence, compel discovery, and investigate possible misconduct—all of which have been swiftly denied or ignored by Cannone. Meanwhile, the prosecution’s motions are almost always granted without meaningful scrutiny. This double standard has effectively tied the hands of the defense while giving the state unchecked power.

Conclusion: A Judge Who Should Not Be on the Bench

Judge Beverly Cannone’s conduct in the Karen Read trial is a stain on the Massachusetts judicial system. She has demonstrated blatant partiality, ignored evidence of misconduct, suppressed exculpatory information, and compromised the defendant’s right to a fair trial.

If this is how she handles high-profile cases under public scrutiny, imagine the injustices taking place in her courtroom when no one is watching. This judge should be investigated, held accountable, and removed from the bench.

Rating: 0/10 – An absolute disgrace to the judiciary.

Other

Comment #: MA934
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Absolutely a biased judge!! ****Please be aware - Over 100 negative reviews against Judge Cannone was deleted from this website this morning **** Voices are being silenced about this judve

Other

Comment #: MA932
Rating:1.0

Comments:
I’ve completely lost faith in the justice system! This judge is so biased, corrupt or intellectually dishonest. Where is her “grave concern” when the CW showed an inverted video? Did she reprimand everytime CW misrepresented something to the court? The difference in how she treats experts is also very telling. How anyone in this state believes in law and order is beyond me!!!

Other

Comment #: MA931
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Terrible judge. Biased. Needs removed from this bench.

Other

Comment #: MA927
Rating:1.0

Comments:
It’s so hard to watch this KR trial and not feel bad for the defense team and Karen. Judge Beverly has repeatedly shown so much biased that she needs to go back to law school and learn what rules of conduct are. She doesn’t give reasons for her not allowing something, she obviously hates Alan Jackson and Karen Read that she makes it easy for the
Prosecutor. She lets Hank Brennen lie intentionally (like a lot) but lashes out like a kindergarten teacher scolding her students. She made each defense attorney stand up and agree with her! They did nothing to deserve that! I think she needs to have a judge come watch the courtroom and watch her in action! She allowed an inverted video the prosecution brought in! Insane! So many things she has done that it makes you wonder how she is a judge? Oh wait I think Michael Morrisey was one that recommended her! That’s convient . This case has so much wrong with it a blind goat would refuse to prosecute. Bev and Hank are in cahoots with the DA! All 3 of them in statements very far apart from each other? I have grave concerns! Not the most widely used verbiage!

Please please please someone look into her conduct at the bench!

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA919
Rating:1.0

Comments:
As an attorney, I expect judges to uphold the principles of due process, fairness, and impartiality. Unfortunately, Judge Beverly Cannone has repeatedly demonstrated a concerning pattern of judicial conduct that raises serious questions about her ability to preside over cases objectively.

In my experience, she has exhibited clear bias in her rulings, disregarded critical evidence, and shown a willingness to suppress testimony that does not align with her apparent predisposition. Rather than applying the law consistently, she appears to favor certain parties, creating an uneven playing field for litigants.

Moreover, her management of the courtroom is often arbitrary and unpredictable, making it exceedingly difficult for attorneys to advocate effectively for their clients. The number of complaints against her is not surprising, as her judicial temperament and rulings frequently fall short of the standard expected of a fair and impartial jurist.

For attorneys handling cases before Judge Cannone, I strongly advise meticulous preparation and vigilance, as procedural fairness may not be guaranteed. Litigants deserve better, and the legal community should not overlook the growing concerns regarding her judicial performance.

Other

Comment #: MA906
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge Bev Cannone months ago-
"Motion to obtain sallyport footage meta data denied."

Also Judge Bev Cannone 3/25/25-
"Evidentiary hearing and motion to dismiss is denied. Although KR discovery rights were in fact violated, defense hasn't proved any footage was manipulated."

Throughout her denial of an Evidentiary Hearing, she states multiple times that facts are unknown, and concludes that due to facts unknown, there will be no hearing. Make that make sense.

Other

Comment #: MA878
Rating:1.0

Comments:
There are people across the entire US & even in multiple other countries following this trial with their jaws on the floor. I don't know how many WTAF moments needs to happen before Judge Bias Bev gives a crap about a defendants rights. It's to the point that I don't care if this defendant killed 100 people this case should have been dismissed. Everyone already knew that this judge was never going to rule the way she should have. We also knew she wouldn't allow an hearing to get answers for the all the EGREGIOUS GOVERNMENT MISCONDUCT!! But I don't think anyone knew how bad she would vouch for & excuse the Commonwealth & all their shenanigans. I've never seen anything so blatantly obvious. The majority in this country are losing any trust in the justice system, Prosecutors, & even the Police.

Anyone that watches the pre trial #1 hearings (which Bias Bev showed her plan to put her thumb on the scales of justice to help the Prosecutor), the trial (as she sighs in the microphone, asks the prosecutor if he wants to object, prevents the defense from using relevant evidence, cuts the defense off as soon as they started making ground, & protected the witnesses & prosecutor & clearly tampered with the jury - removing jurors & the shady way she chose the alternates & forman) and now pre trial hearings for trial #2 (her disrespectful treatment of the defense & defendant, her going against her own prior rulings ONLY BECAUSE IT BENEFITS THE PARTY SHE IS HELPING, embarrassing & chastising the top professional defense attorneys, allowing Lanigan hearings for all the defense experts including ones that were already allowed in first trial & then putting in her ruling they were a close call and also adding things she thinks the prosecutor can attack on cross in her ruling, allowing the prosecutor to speak about things he never put in a motion and then taking his word even after he has been caught lying & misrepresenting a ton of what he is spewing, she makes the defense put everything in a motion otherwise they can't argue it, she refused to give the defendant a refund for $13k on am expert sent to look at video that wasn't there once he arrived & then after she denied the refund for the defendant the prosecutor miraculously found that video.

I could continue all day long and never have enough time & room to call out the LONG list of such EGREGIOUS violations. Attorneys around the world are saying it's something they have never seen in their career. Regular people have stopped watching & just read updates because it raises their blood pressure & stress levels. I have never seen a worse persecution. Where are the Feds? Who is going to finally be the hero and have the balls to stand up and do something? This judge needs removed from the bench yesterday.

She denied her own order asking her to recuse knowing the public was already claiming she was connected. It was further proven to be true. This judge REQUESTED this case. That should tell you everything. She has a plan & it's to help convict an innocent women to protect the guilty ones in that house.

More people wake up and see this daily. It's not going to go away. Judge Bias Bev doesn't deserve the robe she is wearing. She actually deserves an orange jump suit for violating the rights of the very person she took an oath to protect. I believe it is only out of jealousy due to seeing how successful the defense lawyers are from California, New York & Massachusetts & she was a public defender that was appointed judge yet these high priced attorneys with their own firms make more than she does. I can't understand why else she has such a hatred towards highly successful attorneys.

Every single criminal defense lawyer should show up to that courtroom and send a clear message to this disgusting judge. We can't allow a judge to reward Prosecutors & Police misconduct while punishing the defense & defendant for even a miniscule of an issue. It's absurd and if this continues & this judge is given qualified immunity then I would suggest everyone leave that rougue state.

Other

Comment #: MA877
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Subject: Formal Complaint Against Judge Beverly J. Cannone – Karen Read Trial

To Whom It May Concern,

I am writing to file a formal complaint against Judge Beverly J. Cannone in connection with her conduct during the Karen Read trial and retrial in Massachusetts. Judge Cannone’s actions represent a grave threat to the integrity of our justice system and the constitutional rights that every American is entitled to. Her consistent bias, disregard for due process, and alignment with the prosecution have made a mockery of this trial and deeply undermined public trust.

The following issues demonstrate the alarming pattern of misconduct and judicial overreach that demand immediate investigation:
1. Violation of Constitutional Rights: Judge Cannone repeatedly allowed the prosecution to suppress evidence that could favor the defense—clear violations of the defendant’s constitutional rights.
2. Undermining the Defense: She routinely permitted the Commonwealth to strategically undercut the defense’s arguments without regard for fairness or legal precedent.
3. Unjustified Rejection of Evidence: Exculpatory evidence presented by the defense was swiftly dismissed without proper explanation or justification.
4. Prosecutorial Misconduct Enabled: The prosecution was allowed to spin narratives and make unsupported claims without accountability or challenge.
5. Partiality Toward the Prosecution: Judge Cannone showed a clear bias in allowing the prosecution to defend third-party individuals potentially implicated in this case—departing from the prosecutor’s duty to seek truth and justice, not convictions at any cost.
6. No Consequences for False Statements: The judge permitted the prosecution to present false or misleading statements without affidavit and later amend them with no sanction or reprimand, despite admissions of error.
7. Misuse of Public Resources: She authorized the appointment of an outside prosecutor—at taxpayer expense—because no other Commonwealth prosecutor wanted to be associated with this deeply flawed case.
8. Double Standards: There was a blatant double standard in how the court treated the defense compared to the Commonwealth, compromising the fairness of the trial.
9. Improper Admission of Hearsay: Judge Cannone allowed hearsay from the prosecution without proper evidentiary support or sworn affidavits.
10. Open Disrespect Toward Defense: Her tone and treatment toward defense counsel and the defendant reflected open hostility and prejudice, in stark contrast to her demeanor with the prosecution.
11. Lack of Judicial Responsibility: She frequently shortened court days, disrupting proceedings and increasing financial strain on the defense, especially given the involvement of out-of-state attorneys.
12. Intentional Burdening of the Defense: The court’s schedule appears designed to drain Karen Read’s resources, further disadvantaging her ability to mount a defense.
13. Failure to Recuse Despite Conflicts: Judge Cannone has known associations with witnesses involved in this case and should have recused herself long ago to preserve impartiality.
14. Appearance of Corruption: There is growing public concern that she is operating in concert with DA Morrissey to shield key figures from scrutiny and ensure Karen Read is wrongfully convicted. This raises serious ethical concerns that must be addressed.
15. Facilitating a Cover-Up: The judge’s conduct appears to support a coordinated effort—alongside Prosecutor Hank Brennan—to protect powerful interests rather than uncover the truth.

The citizens of Massachusetts, and this country, deserve a justice system that operates with transparency, fairness, and accountability. At this moment, those principles have been trampled in the courtroom of Judge Cannone.

I respectfully request a formal investigation into her conduct and demand that appropriate action be taken to restore the integrity of this trial and protect the constitutional rights of the accused.

Sincerely,

Christina Detisch

Other

Comment #: MA876
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge Beverly Cannone is one of the worst judges I have ever seen. She is very unprofessional at how she talks the defense lawyers but when she talks to The prosecutors she very friendly and even asks them if they want to object. She acts like a member of the prosecution team against the defense it’s very weird and unsettling . She even laughed that at a pretrial hearing that the prosecutor lied to her about handing over evidence to the defense and the defense let her know and she Laughed about it but always lashes and speaks badly about the defense. This judge is either awful at her job, corrupt or biased, based on her rulings which half the time make no sense she seems to have rules for the defense and none for the prosecutor. She has made everyone afraid of our judicial system if all judges are like this. She needs to removed from the bench or placed in traffic court which I would be afraid for those who had to go infront of her even there.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA867
Rating:1.0

Comments:
As a defense attorney, I have had the opportunity to observe and interact with numerous judges throughout my career. Unfortunately, Judge Beverly Cannone’s handling of cases raises serious concerns regarding due process, judicial impartiality, and defendants’ rights.

Judge Cannone has demonstrated a pattern of rulings that disproportionately favor the prosecution, often restricting the defense’s ability to present key evidence, cross-examine witnesses effectively, or argue critical motions. This imbalance directly undermines the adversarial process, which is essential for a fair trial. The role of a judge is to act as an impartial arbiter, yet too often, her decisions appear to align with prosecutorial interests at the expense of the accused’s constitutional rights.

Additionally, her courtroom demeanor has been described as dismissive and unapproachable, particularly toward defense counsel advocating for their clients. A fair legal system requires judges who are willing to listen to all parties, apply the law without bias, and ensure that justice is not only served but also seen to be served.

When judges fail to uphold these principles, it damages public trust in the judiciary and jeopardizes the rights of those who rely on the courts for a fair trial. Based on my experiences and those of my colleagues, I believe that a formal review of Judge Cannone’s judicial conduct is necessary to ensure that the rights of defendants are not being systematically eroded in her courtroom.

Court Staff

Comment #: MA862
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
As a court staff member in another jurisdiction, I have had the opportunity to observe and compare the practices of various judges, including Judge Beverly Cannone. Unfortunately, her handling of cases raises serious concerns regarding judicial integrity, courtroom management, and adherence to due process.

Judge Cannone has developed a reputation for rulings that appear to favor the prosecution at the expense of a balanced legal process. Numerous reports suggest that she routinely limits the defense’s ability to present key evidence or question witnesses effectively. Such practices undermine the fairness that our legal system is built upon.

Additionally, accounts from litigants and attorneys indicate that her judicial temperament is inconsistent with the standards expected of a fair and impartial judge. Courtroom proceedings under her oversight have been described as hostile and dismissive, particularly toward individuals who challenge her rulings or seek accountability.

A judge’s duty is to ensure that justice is administered fairly and without bias. When judicial conduct repeatedly falls short of these principles, it damages public trust in the courts. Based on observations and widespread concerns, a formal review of Judge Cannone’s courtroom practices may be necessary to restore confidence in the judicial process.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA860
Rating:1.0

Comments:
As a legal practitioner, I have had the opportunity to observe Judge Beverly Cannone's courtroom conduct and judicial decision-making. Unfortunately, I have significant concerns regarding her ability to uphold the principles of impartiality, due process, and judicial integrity.

Judge Cannone has demonstrated a pattern of rulings that raise questions about her adherence to fundamental legal standards. In high-profile cases, she has exhibited deference to prosecutorial arguments while limiting the defense’s ability to present a full and fair case. This imbalance undermines the adversarial process and erodes public confidence in judicial neutrality.

Additionally, reports from colleagues and litigants suggest that Judge Cannone’s courtroom demeanor can be dismissive, particularly toward individuals who challenge her rulings or seek accountability. A judge’s role is to ensure fairness, not to impose undue restrictions that hinder the pursuit of justice.

The legal community relies on judges who apply the law consistently, free from external influence or personal bias. When judicial conduct repeatedly falls short of these expectations, it is imperative to call attention to such concerns. Based on observed proceedings and documented complaints, I believe a review of Judge Cannone’s performance is warranted to ensure that justice is not compromised in her courtroom.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA857
Rating:10.0

Comments:
One of the best judges on the bench

Other

Comment #: MA844
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This Judge is biased [Redacted by Ed.] in her dealings with the CW v. Read case. She is very demeaning to the defense and defendant. Cannone seems to baby the CW and gas close ties with the DA of Norfolk County and some of its witnesses! She needs to recuse herself and somehow retire

Other

Comment #: MA784
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Bev,
Please educate yourself on the matters before the court before you make rulings. Your rulings have been spurious at best.

You're embarrassing yourself.

1) Attorneys can ask leasing questions on cross examination. Just because YOU think it's argumentative doesn't make it objectionable. And not allowing the basis of objections to be heard, you end up wasting more time at sidebar because you have to justify yourself, which, since you seem to be extremely defensive, comes across as petty.

2) 3rd party culprit evidence - in pretrial motions, you claimed you could exclude the evidence outright... If you want to get your verdict immediately appealed, then go right ahead. We all know you have a GREAT public appeal record.

3) Please be consistent when applying your rulings. When you hold one party to, I don't know, not "wasting time" or instructing then to move on, but then let another party talk at length, for hours, on anything not relevant to the case, you just appear to have no qualms giving them massive leeway.

4) You are obviously a control freak. That's going to get on your nerves, but you need to think about how that affects your bias. If someone presents facts or law alternative to your points, you need to be actually receptive, and not fake simperingly sweet. It comes off as pathetic.

In conclusion, either step down as you are very clearly unfit for your position or retire early. It would improve the justice system significantly.