Hon. Martin D. Dorsey See Rating Details
Associate District Judge
Circuit Court
Baltimore City County
8th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Martin D. Dorsey


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD9069
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge is an extreme reverse racist. I understand that Black people have been at a disadvantage for a long time, but for him to completely side with an ignorant, uneducated woman, SOLELY because she’s black and hand out judgment against the interracial couple she disrupted, this man should not be a judge at all! He REFUSED to see that she threatened a family in their home with a problem SHE started. His favoritism was apparent the whole time we were at the hearing and it was uncomfortable because he was very friendly to the defendant and hostile to the couple. I guess if you’re black, you’re good with this judge but if you’re any other race, I’m sorry, he WILL rule AGAINST you!

Litigant

Comment #: MD7596
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Not particularly enthused or impartial to State's Attorney's office. Open collusion in my opinion. Failed to see logic in situation that should not have been as intense in litigation as possible.