Hon. William A. Snoddy See Rating Details
Circuit Judge
Circuit Court
Prince George's County
7th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.1 - 5 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 6 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. William A. Snoddy


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD9577
Rating:1.0
Comments:
` Judge doesn’t go by the law. He go by his personal opinion, which is unjust. Sadly, I believe I voted for him. SMH!!

Other

Comment #: MD9528
Rating:1.0
Comments:
1 Star is being nice buddy. If you get this Judge don't even show up. If you choose to appear, You will have to drink a 6 pack of Budweiser beer to forget it all.

Other

Comment #: MD9427
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This magistrate is a disgrace.

He placed me on child support, even though I was never served.

The Sherriffs showed up at an address that I’ve never lived at and were told I wasn’t a resident.

The sheriff then signs the resident’s name and writes ‘wife’ in the line corresponding to who he served.

The resident was NOT my wife.

Judge Snoddy flat out lied , on the record, to my face saying ,as he held up a piece of paper, “it says here that the sheriff handed this to you personally,”contradicting what another magistrate said weeks prior who oversaw the case and decided to bang the gavel for a continuance after I mention the discrepancies.

Magistrate Snoddy also came up with an amount not based on any formula or pay stubbs because I hadn’t brought any to court. He asked me what I did for a living. I told him I was a bartender and his only response was “oh they make good money” and came up with an amount of $850/ month plus arrears .
Arrears dating from a time where my daughter was living with me and my new girlfriend because she has been abandoned by her mother with us for 6 months.

He also proceeded without proper paternity having been established.Moreover, I have 50/50 Custody and myself and mother of my children are Virginia residents.

I brought ALL of these things to his attention to no avail. My case was a complete sham and based in Fraud. PG Family Court is rogue.

I’m poised to sue.
Anyone else who has been wronged by this tyrant and wish to become a part of a class action 1983 civil lawsuit , please contact me soon at
Mykwhiteel@gmail.com

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD9361
Rating:3.0
Comments:
A real jerk. Makes crazy statements from the bench. This guy should get off the bench.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD9224
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Bad judge. Not very nice. Arrogant and brusque. Not as smart as he thinks he is. Needs to retire or find another line of work.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD8363
Rating:1.7
Comments:
An aptly named individual. Basically a bully. Zero experience in private practice and it shows. Makes snide and unprofessional remaks on the record routinely. Sorry if you draw him for anything.

Litigant

Comment #: MD8237
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I felt coerced into agreeing to a custody decision by this court. I was told that if I didn't agree to a decision that was argued by both parties' lawyers at the judge's bench, with a noise machine on so I couldn't hear what was being said, then the judge would make a worse for me. This judge also said that the opposing party would eventually be able to take my toddler anywhere. The opposing party was a man whose violence sent me to surgery, who set fire to my house, and believed he had a demon living inside of him. Judge Snoddy's decision did very little to protect me or my toddler. We are extremely lucky to still be alive.

Litigant

Comment #: MD7842
Rating:1.0
Comments:
We the people will never see real transparency as it relates to the judicial system and the dishonor that some individuals brings to it. I’ve submitted and screenshoted 2 comments on this platform, that has been removed concerning this judge, I wonder how many more comments that have been left by others have been removed. Watch out for this new and upcoming judge. Shaking My Head

Litigant

Comment #: MD7647
Rating:1.0
Comments:
If there was an option to give this judge a zero rating, that is what I would give him. Nothing about him is honorable

Litigant

Comment #: MD7643
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I realize I didn’t state what this dishonorable judge ordered, he ordered that the smooth criminal of the last 14 years, current drug court participant, who currently attends alcohol and drugs related weekly meetings, joint custody... He took sole custody away from me, a ordered joint custody between that father and me, my children has to spend 7 days at a time living at their grandmother’s (who this case was really about) house... I still can’t fathom a judge being in his right, who signed up for serving justice would make such an erroneous call as such ???????