Comment #: MI282
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
[Redacted by Ed.]She never knows why we are in court, never reads or takes notes. Never looks at transcripts from previous dates. Stretching my divorce out for going on 4 years with no kids. Its only about my property, and puting me in a poor house. She ignores evidence as if she never saw anything, ignores property already taken and put in storage when ex returned. Ignores court rules, makes threats, and judges based on accusations with no proof. She is an ex prosecutor and was totally biased when she saw pictures of marijuana plants that were well within legal limits in our state. She has cost me my retirement and now wants me to pay spousal support with my inheritance money, I am waiting for my social security disability due to a severe vascular disease. I also have to pay ex 1/2 of the money that was in the bank in Nov. 2020, the same money i was ordered to maintain status quo. Every penny of that money was paid on bills. The kicker is my ex received the exact same amount from unemployment as I did, mine paid bills, with proof, her money she spent on who knows what. She has ruled against me in every single way that she could, even when case law is on my side. She should be removed from the bench immediately

Comment #: MI223
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I have stood before this woman and every time she has went out of her way to shame me and attack me on every thing she can dig up.She also brings up criminal matters from the past 12 -20 years ago that have nothing to do with a civil case.This judge is mentally ill and very abusive and excessive towards everyone who opposes her. I don't understand how she is able to remain on the bench.Complete travesty of Justice.

Comment #: MI191
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I fundamentally don't understand her issue. She's extremely condescending, rude, and flippant. She appears not to be able to grasp basic legal concepts. She was absolutely thrilled to tell me that she prides herself on not granting adjournments in civil cases, even when she schedules a (C)(8) motion six months out. The case evaluation panel took pity on both opposing counsel and I when we expressed our frustration. I have serious concerns for her docket.

Comment #: MI123
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I have found Suzanne Geddis to be impartial, fair and completely unbiased. Although I am not involved in the court system, I am familiar with all of the judges and she is probably the most neutral judge Livingston County has. Anyone who goes before her can expect to be treated with professionalism and be confident that justice will be served.

Comment #: MI118
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judicial Tenure NOW!
It is a real shame that our legal system can be misused in such a manner. Is there no oversight?
The attorneys in this court who find it necessary to 'go along' must live in daily fear of when they will take the fall. But the system integrity must be maintained. That is what generations have fought for.

Comment #: MI104
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Contemplating sending this Judge to Judicial Tenure. She overlooks what is important. Her judgements do not typically go by MI State Law. I believe also she is ill both physically and mentally. I think it really is unbelieveable that Mcririe and Geddes are even allowed to practice Law in the same county. This gal does what she wants to do......DO NOT USE THIS JUDGE OR THE LAW FIRM OF NEIL NEILSON if at all possible.

Comment #: MI82
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I have never seen a judge be so horrible in my life. She not only breaks the law but does not even care who's life she destroys. She does not ever read the motions or even listen to the lawyers. She is absolutely the worse judge ever on a bench

Comment #: MI79
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Absolutely one of THE worst judges ever to sit on the bench! Passes judgement on the seriousness of the charge alone not actual evidence! Don't know if she's losing her mental facilities (shaking the entire time on the bench) or if perhaps medication is impairing her judgement. But, regardless she should be removed asap. Ruled in favor of keeping a baseless PPO based SOLELY on a UNRELATED incident that happened 3 years prior in which no charges were ever filed & no arrests were even made & had absolutely no merit or bearing on the PPO case currently before the court. And to make matters worse, Judge Geddis berated the plaintiff at the start for "PPO shopping" after the plaintiff's attorney failed to secure a PPO from another county. But oddly enough, Geddis let the hearing going on anyway. I say "hearing" because it wasn't in actuality a hearing, more like a sentencing. Geddis didn't give the defense a chance to speak at all. Did a complete 180 based solely on that unrelated 3 year old incident. Totally absurd BS ruling! Injustice if ever there was a such a thing.