Hon. Micael P Estremera See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Santa Clara County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.8 - 4 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 6 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Micael P Estremera


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA55810
Rating:1.5
Comments:
Baby judge. He’s insecure as a result. He’ll let his favorites lead him by the nose. Be careful.

Other

Comment #: CA55699
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Michael P. Estremera demonstrates clear bias and discrimination, violating the rights of litigants who appear before him. He is easily offended and punishes those who do not cater to his ego, rather than ruling based on facts and the law. He operates within a network of court officials who suppress complaints against him, ensuring that victims of his misconduct are silenced. His actions deny due process, disregard ADA accommodations, and perpetuate systemic injustice. A judge who prioritizes personal grudges over justice has no place in family law or cases involving children.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA55660
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Very rude, short tempered, does not let fathers speak unless they have an attorney but will let moms speak all the time, lets moms hide income even when mom admits to having additional income and not telling the courts or child support for years, biased, possibly racist, does not hold moms accountable for coaching and withholding child, nor does he hold moms in contempt for violating court order even when there is clear evidence, lets minor council lie in court and get away with it even when there is evidence of the lie presented to him.

Litigant

Comment #: CA55614
Rating:2.0
Comments:
Woof. Pushey and shortemperd and mean

Litigant

Comment #: CA55381
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Toxico

Litigant

Comment #: CA55367
Rating:1.0
Comments:
trippin. my lawyer told me he was a crimnial lawyer so why is he in family court? not good for families and messes with poeple.

Other

Comment #: CA55094
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Big bully. Doesn't listen to female litigants. Rude and condescending.

Litigant

Comment #: CA55011
Rating:1.0
Comments:
bullies people that are already in a bad way and distresed

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA54967
Rating:1.7
Comments:
This judge has an obvious bias against women. He uses his position as a judge to abuse women in his court. He is unfair and is abusive to elders as well. Especially elder females. Especially white females that are not financially fluid.

Litigant

Comment #: CA54365
Rating:3.0
Comments:
Appointed not elected

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA54289
Rating:2.8
Comments:
Temperamental, plays favorites with lawyers including schoolmate and with parties, rude and patronizing, bully, andgender biased. Seems fixed in first opinions.