"The Robing Room: NY State Judges

Hon. Arlene Katz	See Rating Details
Family Court
Westchester County	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 1 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 6.0 - 1 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Arlene Katz

Comments

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY13743
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Indecisive but defers to male attorneys for children;lacks knowledge of law and is indecisive.

Other

Comment #: NY13665
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Indecisive; relies on her law clerk to make decisions for her. Weak knowledge of the law.

Litigant

Comment #: NY10546
Rating:6.0

Comments:
She allows matters to linger to long. She has a good temperment. Her judgement can change from court appearance. She appears to favor toward the atty for child without taken everything into consideration. My child has been abused under the courts watch yet said child remains in the abusers custody. Court does not verify incidents. Not everything shows Up and their system. System background checks doest show full history of abusers. You cant expect a Fair hearing. Wishy washy court room.