"The Robing Room: CA State Judges

Hon. Lee S Arian	See Rating Details
Judge Superior Court
Los Angeles County	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 1.1 - 2 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 6.0 - 2 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Lee S Arian

Comments

Other

Comment #: CA55329
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
One would think that when a California law library provides guidance to help self-represented parents navigate the complexities of withdrawing funds from blocked accounts, the court system would approach such cases with understanding and compassion. These instructions note, "Occasionally, a court grants permission to the parent, guardian, or custodian of a minor..."—a recognition of the delicate situations families often face.

Yet, in this instance, the judge not only denied the petition but chose to remain in chambers, avoiding a direct and respectful conversation with the petitioner. Instead, the petitioner was left to endure the humiliation of hearing a harsh and dismissive decision read aloud by the judge’s clerk, in full view of everyone present.

This decision failed to consider the parent’s struggles and the severe consequences that could arise. For instance, if the parent is unable to ensure the minor child’s timely attendance at school due to financial constraints, the state itself could intervene by issuing a warrant against them. Such outcomes only compound the stress and hardship on families who are already doing their best to navigate challenging circumstances.

The role of a judge carries the immense responsibility of weighing not only the letter of the law but also the humanity of those seeking justice. In this case, it’s heartbreaking to see how this responsibility was disregarded, leaving a family in even greater turmoil.

Litigant

Comment #: CA52798
Rating:10.0

Comments:
Judge Arian was so kind and patient. My ex could afford a high-priced lawyer, and I had to represent myself. Judge Arian cared as much about what I had to say as the lawyer and ended up giving me the time with my dog that I asked for.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA47660
Rating:1.0

Comments:
lacks basic temperament, legal knowledge, evidentiary rules and shows extreme bias.

in a case where a minor who was molested sought a restraining order, Judge Arians sided with the predator and refused to protect the minor and children from a convicted felon with history of violence and active warrant.

he also knowingly looked the other way on perjury and allowed recordings of children that violated California's eavesdropping statutes.

This is the type of judge who should never be allowed in our legal system and strongly urge anyone with a case to seek a substitution if possible.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA46522
Rating:1.1

Comments:
good example of judge who has allowed his position to go to his head. not very well-versed in law and shows bias and anger easily.

Other

Comment #: CA40333
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I witnessed Judge make a ruling in favor of a father gaining custody, even after mother expressing exhibits of domestic violence, drug abuse, alcohol abuse, harassment, coercion, and yes even child molestation to a 20 month old girl. Judge didn’t care to see evidence.
Judge was very chummy with the attractive opposing attorney and didn’t take anything I said into consideration; however, believed all the lies He believed their entire declaration and mine backed up by evidence as lies. This guy seems very slow and biased. I’m sorry to have had to sit and hear this case.
I see why he is temp. Maybe should be reevaluated. - concerned citizen