"The Robing Room: NY State Judges

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Thomas H. Scuccimarra

Comments

Other

Comment #: NY4422
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
As to my understanding of my friends case to her unbeknowest of any activities occurring for 2 years by her lawyers who she was putting all her trust to in a malpractice/surgical error case and she thought she lost the case, as she was told to come to me and when i read the decision and order, i put 2 and 2 together and that is when i saw that the case would have expired on 03/21/2013 if i did not fax the document with in the 90 day motion she kept mentioning to me. The 1st couple of pages told me that The Judge Hon. Thomas H. Scuccimarra saw something wrong with the councilman's side of trying to deviate themselves by committing perjury while the claimant was not seen. They stated they had a conflict. How when she did not even seen the lawyers for 2 years. I cannot write anymore but i give 101% recommendation and credit to The Judge. Hon. Thomas Scuccimarra.

Other

Comment #: NY4325
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I am rating Hon: Thomas Scuccimarra based on a case he has pending to put back in motion. As i read the claimants documents i saw that the judge saw something wrong was going on in her case. I am the person who is helping her since she was taken advantage of, she is a vulnerable beautiful humble woman and she had no knowledge as to what was occurring. I do not want to say anything here. I just want to say. Thank You Your Honor. See you soon.