"The Robing Room: NY State Judges

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Cenceria P Edwards

Comments

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY10896
Rating:1.3

Comments:
The comment below regarding this Judge is 100% accurate. There is not enough space to question the legitimacy of her appointment and I would question how she made it through law school. I am an attorney with over 20 years experience. I brought my breach of contract to the other attorneys for review. There really was nothing in question. I answered every question the judge had. Her first comment to me was $5000 dollars is a lot of money you are asking for. I had every receipt and even the opposing party did not dispute the repair or cost. She also mentioned it had been a few years. Then why is there a time limit which I fell within. I swear she cannot handle complex matters and is frightened to back up her lack of intelligence in making a decision. With all respect this judge is a token unable to practice law and should not be in judgement of others. She flipped through pages without reading them. She looked at receipts without understanding them. An insult to the judicial process.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY9524
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Dumb and lazy. Does not read the moving papers. Did she ever actually graduate from law school? Very hard to tell.