Hon. Mary V Rosado See Rating Details

Civil Court
New York County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.5 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Mary V Rosado


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY13801
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Every experience with this judge has been surreal. She has no clue.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY12864
Rating:1.1
Comments:
[Redacted by Ed.] Even though the parties wanted to argue the merits, she was interested only in procedure, and refused to deal with the merits. And even though she admitted she was confused, she herself would not stop talking or let the parties explain the situation at all. She finally just ended the hearing by adjourning it; but of course, if she stays befuddled, the next hearing will be just as much of a mess. It was worse experience I have ever had in a courtroom, and I've practiced in housing court before it had a website.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY7153
Rating:2.3
Comments:
This Judge appears to be absolutely miserable. She is rude & ill tempered every day. She defers constantly to her staff for even the most mundane matters. Her face is set in an unrelenting evil grimace & every word spoken appears to annoy her. It's hard to believe that ingratiated herself enough with the powers that be to become a judge.