Comment #: NY11794
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Resigned from the bench at the end of this month due to his drunk driving arrest. He gave me some fair decisions 7-8 years ago, then a few that were flat-out illogical a few years later. Was he drinking while on the bench too? Maybe all of his decisions should be thrown out for the last few years. Were they written by law clerk Anne? Did Rebolini even see them?

Comment #: NY10247
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Oh yeah Rebolini is a wonderful judge( scarsicam intended); when he’s not DWI and getting locked up for it!!!Get real he’s DIRT. Ask any of his 3 ex-wives. As for his ex law clerk (Amy the animal)conflict of interests are the least of that piece of garbage’s attrtitbtes. Either way 2 low life’s off the states payroll abit all too late.

Comment #: NY10244
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Rebolini himself is a good judge. However, his previous clerk, Anne Malloy Boucher, took a job as an attorney recently at the huge law firm of Certiliman Balin in February 2018. Full disclosure of when she first interviewed for that job should have been offered to all relevant parties, as it is possible she was working as a clerk on cases where Certilman Balin were appearing. It is possible she recused herself, but all should be disclosed.

Comment #: NY10187
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Just saw Rebolini got locked up for DWI couldn't have happened to a more deserving person. What does that say about the validity of his rulings; was he sober or drunk at the time. Karma.

Comment #: NY6737
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Horrible. Judge Rebolini oversaw a case where wells fargo provided false ownership of note docs.
the defendant is now doing a short sale, where fannie mae has acknowledged ownership of the note- Rebolini granted that ownership to Wells Fargo, who provided a forged note. Fraud against the judicial system, with Rebolini aoking it- disgusting.
BAD JUDGE- BOUGHT AND PAID FOR.

Comment #: NY5951
Rating:1.0
Comments:
The law clerk is a power hungry loser who is a gross incompetent animal. The judge is never anywhere to be found and both should be fired, arrested and deported.

Comment #: NY5950
Rating:1.0
Comments:
A complete fool who is a thief and belongs behind bars not in front of them.

Comment #: NY4955
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This judge has no concept of domestic violence issues, spousal litigation abuse, or the cost of litigation and its impact on the sole parent to provide for the child. He failed to provide even one-quarter of an award of legal fees, despite the other side's constant refusal to follow court orders, frivolous motions and failure to jail the offending party. He is a disgrace to the office, and should be summarily disrobed.

Comment #: NY3129
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This judge failed to read between the lines and took documents at face value. Somethings are not always as they appear and the defendants created quite an impressive illusion of smoke and mirrors that a seasoned judge should have seen through.

There was pure negligence, when you are presented with conflicting documentation and you fail to question the legitimacy of its content.

This case involved a convoluted work arrangement with the false appearance of an employee/employer relationship. Had the judge actually read the agreement between the two, he would have and should have questioned it.

Due process is not served when a judge is negligent and dismisses a case and condones the misappropriation of public funds when he actually acknowledges it as an accusation of "ONE TIME WASTE OF" public funds. One-time, is one too many times and had he heard all the evidence he would know that he only heard about one example, as there was more "WASTE" and misappropriation going on.

Obstruction of justice is when a judge can dismiss a case without hearing all the evidence or witness testimony.

The judge also failed to acknowledge that the plaintiff was offered a cash settlement for a signed release of all claims against the defendants. This is condoning that money can buy someone's silence. This is a dangerous practice and if the shoe were on the other foot and the plaintiff demanded money for their silence, that would be extortion.

Thank you Judge Rebolini for allowing the fox to remain in the hen house. Public funds are not safe when judges condone misuse of them and then tells the plaintiff that the whistleblower policy doesn't apply here.

If you see something, say something, but don't expect our judicial system to back you up.

Comment #: NY1219
Rating:2.5
Comments:
Relies on staff for everything. Litigated two cases that were resolved (1 by summary judgement by him one by a a plaintiff withdrawing) and I have yet to actually see him after several years of conferences. Simple cases don't get resolved and simple procedural issues become major headaches with regularity.