Hon. Roger N. Rosengarten See Rating Details

Supreme Court
Queens County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.1 - 8 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Roger N. Rosengarten


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY12357
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This guy was a clown when he was in Criminal Court, Queens County. Nothing has changed. Just another poltical hack who needs a job from the left-wing Democrats.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY4812
Rating:2.4
Comments:
If this judge ever left the putting green in his chambers, I might be able to give him a fairer rating. But, since he is less seen and more often heard only through his ridiculous decisions, his rating must stay low. I gave him a high rating for industriousness because he has figured out how to get paid while doing nothing.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY2514
Rating:7.8
Comments:
I found his decisions to reveal his understanding of issues that go beyond the legal issues before him. that require his use of equity powers.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY1645
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Never in courtroom, doesn't have a clue about the law or how to apply it. Doesn't deserve and is unfit to sit in Supreme Court.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY1643
Rating:1.0
Comments:
One of the absolute WORST judges in Queens. REMOVE him.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY1385
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Exceptionally lazy judge who is never seen. He practices his golf swing in chambers while his less than able law secretary handles all of the hard work.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY922
Rating:9.6
Comments:
One of the best judges in Queens by far.