"The Robing Room: NY State Judges

Hon. Randy Sue Marber	See Rating Details
Supreme Court
Nassau County	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 3.3 - 15 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: - 0 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Randy Sue Marber

Comments

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY13713
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Absolutely terrible judge. Ignores CPLR and the law just to clear docket. A disgrace

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY13376
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Has anyone gotten a Judicial Monitor from the AJ on this one

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY11977
Rating:8.1

Comments:
Judge Marber is fair to all Parties. She is respectful of attorneys and hears out their arguments. I've never had a problem with her, although I have never tried a case before her.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY11302
Rating:8.7

Comments:
recently on trial before her.
treated both sides well, worked hard to settle the case.
a pleasure to appear before.
her courtroom staff were equally good.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY11283
Rating:2.1

Comments:
Could be the dumbest Judge on the bench. Favors the defendants. Her biggest problem is she thinks she is intelligent.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY10540
Rating:3.9

Comments:
Biased against Plaintiffs. Brags that her skills can settle $12,000 cases. Has no ability to think outside the box. Simply has zero oral or reading comprehension. In the face of conflicts in testimony offers an opinion that the testimony is consistent.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY9095
Rating:10.0

Comments:
My experience is quite the contrary to those testimonials appearing here. I have found Judge Marber to be fair and deliberative, her opinions well reasoned (even if, hypothetically, I was on the wrong end of one) and pleasant to appear before. I've never seen her act vindictively or allow her ego to enter the courtroom or accompany her to the bench. The robes are plain black for a reason. They are a mask of sorts, a statement of "sameness" or uniformity of interest in justice. Justice may be reached by different paths, and Judge Marber's path may be different from, perhaps, either of the two Judge Murphys sitting down the hallway, but it is justice that they administer. And as one commentator pointed out, if one disagrees with the Judge's Decision and Order, one always has an avenue of appeal. A

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY8477
Rating:1.1

Comments:
This judge gives laziness and intellectual dishonesty a new meaning.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY6020
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Unfortunately this judge lets her court attorney decide cases for her before trial instead of listening to the evidence and deciding the case herself.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY4472
Rating:1.9

Comments:
Maybe they should cut her salary and give the balance to others who feel their role to be a judge is to listen to lawyers and not just to flail. The woman has a big reversal rate.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY3797
Rating:2.3

Comments:
It is a shame that the Nassau bar that has so many talented jurists is sullied by a mean spirited, nasty, opinionated and over her head judge such as Marber. Ask just about any lawyer and you will get a similar opinion. If the democrats nominate her again they will just be driving those in the know to the republican line.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY3530
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Marber seems to have become increasingly frustrated in carrying out her responsibilities, and it is a mystery as to why this is. As a Law Secretary, she was very evenhanded, deliberative, thoughtful and respectful to attorneys. Now she seems unable to focus on the matter at hand and renders decisions that are poorly thought through, seemingly without concern over how an incorrect decision will impact a litigant. If she could "get it together" as she was in the past, she could be a good judge. One wonders whether this will ever happen. Seems she may have fallen victim to the black robe disease.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY3227
Rating:1.0

Comments:
The nastiest judge I've ever come across. She does not have a clue about the law.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY2870
Rating:4.0

Comments:
Can be very nasty, and appears to want a reputation as a toughie. However, she will push parties to settle when in her opinion it is really only about money.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY2842
Rating:1.3

Comments:
Dumb and very anti plaintiff and nasty at least I am a woman she was nicer to me but to men she is terrible

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY2595
Rating:1.4

Comments:
way out of her pay scale. She was was only dangerous up to $15,000 while in District court now she is a loose cannon ball with minimum legal ability and maximum danger

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY1640
Rating:2.0

Comments:
A mean streak