Hon. Linda R. Fleming See Rating Details
Judge
Common Pleas
Cambria County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 6 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Linda R. Fleming


Comments


Other

Comment #: PA429
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Lundy Bancroft, therapist and author:

"It's time to say the obvious truth straight up...The Family court system across the continent had become the moral equivalent of a slave trade. Mothers and children have no rights at all, the Constitution is thrown out the window. Millions of dollars are being made by professionals off of denying domestic abuse of children and siding with the perpetrator instead. Loving mothers are having their children torn away from them when they haven't even been accused of anything or where the only accusation is that they've tried to protect their children from an abusive father --exactly what the child needs the mother to do --and therefore are declared guilty of "parental alienation".

Consider this: The court is ruling that even fathers who are confirmed to have molested their children, should continue to have a relationship with their children as if these things hadn't happened. But a mother who won't shut up about the abuse? That's a reason to cut her off from her children in the court's eyes.

Ignorance, I'm sorry to say, is not the problem. The problem is horrible mother-hating attitudes combined with greed and more greed. And this means, unfortunately, that training for judges and other court personnel are not the answer.... You can train ignorance, but you can't train hateful outlooks or the hunger for money and power.

Things are just getting worse. Judges are imposing gag orders on mothers, forbidding them to discuss their custody evaluators report with anyone other than their own lawyers. So much for free speech; she's violating the court order if she asks someone whether they actually said what the evaluator claims they said. I had the experience of seeing a custody evaluation that I wasn't supposed to have access to --and found the evaluator quoted me as saying the exact opposite of what I said about a key question....

I'm afraid passing better laws won't help much either, because family court judges consider themselves above the law so they ignore it. (Except when they want to blame their bad actions on the law --then suddenly they claim that the law leaves them no choice)."

* * * * *

Personally, I think the judges developed their misogynist attitudes towards women to justify their own corruption and grift. Either way, it's a criminal racket and the judges, attorneys and experts involved should all be prosecuted. Flemming is not above the law, judge or not.

Other

Comment #: PA428
Rating:1.0
Comments:
If this judge decides she does not like someone, she will make their life pure hell. This conduct adversely affects the children involved. In other words, she is openly biased.

Other

Comment #: PA398
Rating:1.0
Comments:
If you are unfortunate enough to have this person for a judge in your case here is what to expect:
1)Due process violations
2)She WILL engage in ex-parte communication.
3)Hearings will be staged and theatrical, with a large amount of displaced beratement.
4)She is a bigot (overtly sexist, ableist).
(a)If you have a disability, she will mock it and you. She does not know the law, but somehow she knows more than doctors, of course.
(b)She makes her disgust for single mothers who are victims of abuse VERY known.
5)She does not accept modern science.
6)She will pick a favorite and proceed to refuse evidence submission, testimony, etc from her target litigant.
7)She will make sure to punish your children if she does not like you.
8)She cannot be bothered to do her job. She will not read anything and will collude with one or both attorney's to make up a narrative. Do not be fooled, your outcome is predetermined.
I could go on and write a novel, but the bottom line is this person is deluded and sadistic.

Other

Comment #: PA350
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This judge does not belong on the bench and must be removed immediately. She is a menace and does follow the law. She violates due process, takes children from good parents, and emotionally abuses children. She rules on hearsay and ignores fact based evidence.
File a motion to disqualify if you get this judge to get her recused from your case - go to the presiding judge.

She blocks all evidence of child abuse and will do everything she can to ruin your appeal and she makes sure that transcripts are altered!

If you have had your civil rights including due process and parental rights, violated by this judge please contact:

www.familycourtanticorruptioncoalition.com

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: PA348
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I feel because of her past tragedies in life, her opinions are screwed with bias. She in my opinion only seeing one side of an argument. I do not believe she truly rules in the best interest of children, but only in the best interests of the parent, or parents.

Litigant

Comment #: PA347
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I’d give a 0, if it were allowed! This DIShonorable judge kidnapped my granddaughter from my custody after she told my attorney to “condense and sanitize my 6 3” binders of evidence “because [I] can’t read all of that.” Perjury is “credible” to her. She encourages it! She wrote a lengthy, inaccurate, “opinion” of me. She doesn’t know me to have an opinion! I tried to convince everyone in Cambria County to vote her out in Nov. To every good parent that will lose custody at her hand, I apologize.

Litigant

Comment #: PA343
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge is HORRENDOUS. She is extremely rude, lacks decorum, and is overtly disrespectful. She is directly harmful to children as she intentionally seeks to “punish” litigants that she is bias against. Additionally, she partakes in quite blatant collusion with counsel, extending proceedings for years without proper cause (ie she does NOT follow legal procedure). She is an utter disgrace to the legal system.

Other

Comment #: PA320
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Not only is Linda incompetent, she lacks common knowledge of law.. or perhaps she is just corrupt.

Litigant

Comment #: PA277
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Her caseload must be overwhelming because my attorney was told to condense the evidence, which she never read anyway. Perjury and bias definitely rule in her courtroom.