Hon. Tarita A. Dunbar See Rating Details
Judge
Family Court
Greenville County
Thirteenth
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.1 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Tarita A. Dunbar


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: SC113
Rating:2.1
Comments:
Allows vindictive, pettiness and abuse from plaintiff's. To hold someone in contempt for being 2 days late on child support after 2 years of 1200 a month??? Threatens 90 days in jail and court theatrics, a waste of court time. There are dead beats parents who never make a payment persecute those people. You and William D. Fore have clearly lost credibility and discernment.

Other

Comment #: SC112
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
[Redacted by Ed.] Ignores the facts of the case and resorts to theatrics and antics. Clearly not an objective and responsible decision maker. Maybe should revise herself from cases where she is being manipulated by a plaintiff's lawyer. To hold someone in contempt for being 2 days late on a child support payment? There are dead beats who never make an attempt at a payment. Threaten those parents, not hard working people being victimized by a vindictive and abusive ex.

Litigant

Comment #: SC42
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Tarita Dunbar is a disgrace to South Carolina Judicial system - She is a constant liability to the South Carolina families. She does NOT need to be re-elected to the Family Court Bench. Our families and children deserve more than her incompetence.

Any families that have been effected by her - please reach out to me and join me in making a stance in November!