Hon. Mark E. Windham See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.9 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Mark E. Windham


Comments


Court Staff

Comment #: CA53783
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Horrid judge and also an attention-seeking missile. He loved the camera during the Durst trial not unlike Ito/OJ. It's unfortunate and disgraceful how he seems unable to manage his courtroom and allows multiple people to speak at once constantly without thought of the court reporters and the historical record.

Litigant

Comment #: CA53129
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I will say that he has improved in the way of his temperament by what I can tell from each of your responses. Even though he still displays the erroneous behavior and has little respect for the true argument of your specific case. He perverts the law into his own spin. Just like all of your responses. For the past 15 years he has changed very little for the good. This calls for a recall. If you are interested then contact me

Litigant

Comment #: CA52297
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Very unethical and horrible demeanor. He appears to be more aligned with a predetermined outcome than doing the work of understanding a case and the law. Do not allow this guy to hear your case he is there for one purpose and that is to ensure the case ends the way his handlers tell him.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA51394
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I’ve only appeared before this judge in one case but I found his behavior on the bench appalling.

Litigant

Comment #: CA38495
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
"Judge" is not worthy of the title. He ran unopposed & that's the only reason he is a judge. Watch his behavior in the Durst case for example. Absolutely arrogant & disgraceful! No fair judge would permit even 1/2 of the prosecutor's questioning to go on for so long. A true pro-prosecution. If you get this Judge as a defendant in a criminal case find a way to remove him for cause immediately!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA38223
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Shockingly unqualified to be sitting pro tem in Division Three of the Court of Appeal thru December 10, 2021. He shamelessly distorts the facts and the law. I feel sorry for those whose lives/interests are placed before him. He is a fraud; it is plain to see.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA12522
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This is the judge from hell. He is bias and prejudice and will manipulate the trial including excusing jurors for race, not allowing defence to present experts and allowing late discovery. You should try ti take deal if you get this guy

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA10472
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Not smart; very rude; very biased in favor of prosecution and against defense; highly unqualified to be a judicial officer; publicity-hungry.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA10290
Rating:3.8
Comments:
HUGE BULLY !
ARROGANT
IMMATURE
SELF-AGGRANDIZING
INTELLECTUALLY DISHONEST
MEDIA MOTIVATED