"The Robing Room: CA State Judges

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Dawna Reeves

Comments

Litigant

Comment #: CA47778
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Watch out people. This Judge has broken laws, acting so outside her duties and abusing authority she knows no bounds. She blatantly ruled there was enough to have me answer in case, the person changed story many times and final version caused the police report filed to be so opposite and causing said report to be filled with nothing but lies. She forced case through knowing subpoena was waiting that proved person and DA fabricated cell phone bill to provide for calls never made and received, arranged with DA's office for fabricating and revising court transcripts, and the topper when we were one juror away from picking jury during voir dire the next day this Judge brings in brand new jury pool. The court documents and transcripts claim jury came into her courtroom when she explained they will no longer be needed and a bunch of dialogue with jury. I spoke to two jurors from that pool and they told me this Judge came into jury deliberating room and simple stated they are no longer needed and left. CRAZY. A bunch more of obvious and retarded acts by this Judge and her former cronies at DA's office.