Hon. Maren E. Nelson See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Maren E. Nelson


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: CA9042
Rating:1.0
Comments:
As Alec Baldwin stated in his book entitled "A Promise to Ourselves" on page 165: "A lawyer would probably have to smuggle a gun into court before someone like Maren Nelson would act accordingly."

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA7055
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This "Judge" appears paralyzed by fear of being wrong so she makes washy washy and haphazard decisions and consistently forgets facts. She relies solely on the lawyers papers and does not listeten to testimony which she has forgotten by the time she gets around to ruling which is typically months and months later. Her rulings are often grammatically incorrect, factually inaccurate, indecisive, erratic and bizarre,

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA7054
Rating:1.0
Comments:
One of if not the worst family law judge in LA Superior Court.

Litigant

Comment #: CA6565
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Most biased, overtly prejudiced, unqualified, unfair, cruel judge ever.