"The Robing Room: CA State Judges

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Robert Tice-Raskin

Comments

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA53727
Rating:1.2

Comments:
Judge Tice-Raskin is not judicious in his rulings and implements rulings based on his personal and inclinations and biases. He is indifferent to the notion of bona fide protection of the laws and inalienable rights governing his constituents and wields his power with literal impunity and indifference to the institutions that are supposed to underlie American jurisprudence. Raskin is more likely to be threatened and insecure at a well presented argument and proper citations, than swayed. He runs a court of personal opinion. A clown court. And his rulings reflect his sheer indifference for proper implementation of proper judgment and the law. And good luck if you’re notably Hispanic looking. You’ll need it in his court.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA53208
Rating:2.6

Comments:
He is like a petulant child on the bench.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA52143
Rating:3.3

Comments:
He is temperamental and indecisive. He is also not very considerate of trial attorneys.