"The Robing Room: CA State Judges

Hon. Margaret Fujioka	See Rating Details
Judge Superior Court
Alameda County	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: - 0 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 2.0 - 2 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Margaret Fujioka

Comments

Other

Comment #: CA45304
Rating:1.0

Comments:
[Redacted by Ed.] absolutely hostile to women and in pro per litigants.

Endless delays and loses filings or just drops them from the docket.

Also blatantly manipulated the court docket to avoid having to answer to a motion to disqualify, then put herself back on the same case. Illegal.

Other

Comment #: CA45292
Rating:4.0

Comments:
Unable to manage calendar. Not a good decision maker.

Litigant

Comment #: CA39481
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I have unfortunately through an ex spouse been dragged through the family court system for 15 years. I have found Judge Fujioka to be the best judge even when on one matter she did not favor my request for the Respondent to be listed as a vexatious litigant which this party has absolutely been over 15 years. She made the process of dealing with him easier than any other judge in the past. I am glad to see that the judges in the Family court have really stepped up over the years to a higher quality.