"The Robing Room: CA State Judges

Hon. Lisa R. Jaskol	See Rating Details
Judge Superior Court
Los Angeles County	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 1.6 - 5 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 5.0 - 2 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Lisa R. Jaskol

Comments

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA53976
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Lazy judge who won't analyze the issues in her rulings. Looks for a way to continue any hearing because she does not review the moving papers on time. She does not work up the matters before her. Terrible judge who needs to be off the bench.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA53900
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Very lazy judge, outcome determinative, misrepresents the law and just looks for a way to kick the can down the road. Don't expect any actual work from this judge.

Prosecutor

Comment #: CA53790
Rating:3.4

Comments:
Very little understanding of civil litigation and the discovery act in California. She is either pro-defense or she simply has little to no experience in civil matters. She has an even temperament but she should know better when it comes to when the defense attorney is trying to weasel their way out of producing discovery.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA48834
Rating:1.4

Comments:
Did not understand the law. Misrepresented, miscited, and misunderstood the law and the Court's standing order. Seemingly can't count to two. Expressly said that she does not allow argument during oral argument and cut off counsel's argument. Horrible judge.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA48451
Rating:1.4

Comments:
By far the least intelligent judge I have ever encountered. And the freaking laziest.

She will not change her tentative ruling. Msy as well submit.

Filing motions to vacate order. She gonna get me to report her soon enough. Get off the bench.

Other

Comment #: CA42655
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Bad decision :Denied a conservatorship case well documented meeting all criteria for gravely disable she ignored the documentation by psychiatrist , county counsel , and did not allow parent to testify.and ruled only in the not truthful and delusional answers of the inmate

Litigant

Comment #: CA13508
Rating:10.0

Comments:
A very good judge. It's so good to see someone with her qualifications in the courtroom.