Hon. Jill Feeney See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.9 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   7.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Jill Feeney


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA53167
Rating:9.4
Comments:
` Judge Feeney is smart, punctual, organized and a good trial judge. Makes decisions that are thoughtful, even one that did not favor my side. You can do a LOT worse for a judge.

Civil Litigation - Govt.

Comment #: CA52717
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I've been defending public entities in Los Angeles for 30 years and never encountered a judge like this. Today I sat through her morning calendar and she set OSC re sanctions on 9 of the 11 cases before me. She even set an OSC re perjury against an attorney for a typo in a declaration. My poor experiences with her has been limited to refusing to continue trial on the first request when mediation is set and paid for 2 weeks after trial, but this woman simply does not have the temperament to even be an attorney, let alone on the bench.

Other

Comment #: CA47680
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
47678 It took you 5 matters in her courtroom to now figure out, that you want to paper this judge, "counsel", at yet you continued to take payment from client/clients'??

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA47678
Rating:1.3
Comments:
She does not care what the Civil Code of Procedure states. It appears that she cares more about clearing her case load than she does about making decisions that consider the law and facts. I have been in her courtroom for about 5 matters - I will be papering her next time we are assigned to this courtroom.

Other

Comment #: CA45420
Rating:4.0
Comments:
Does not impose sanctions on attorneys or parties when they are clearly warranted.

Other

Comment #: CA40983
Rating:10.0
Comments:
I was a plaintiff last week and Judge Jill Feeney, was the judge , I have to say iam so happy with her decision. She gave me a chance to amend my complain and gave me enough days , she was patient and kind , she listened to my story . She is a real person , she cared about my issue and was so patient, thank u judge Feeney for giving me the chance . U are truly appreciated. U are a great judge and person , thank u for understanding us women .????????