"The Robing Room: CA State Judges

Hon. Jeanmarie K Warren	See Rating Details
Judge Superior Court
Los Angeles County	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 1 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 10.0 - 1 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Jeanmarie K Warren

Comments

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA55022
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge Jean-Marie Warren is nothing more than a bitter, aging woman abusing her power. It was clear from the start she had a personal grudge against me. With her saggy turkey neck and smug expression, she looked at me with pure disdain, like she couldn’t stand the sight of someone younger and more confident. The whole trial was a farce. She twisted the facts to suit her own narrative, not because of justice, but because of jealousy and spite.

It’s terrifying to think someone like her is willing to take away someone’s constitutional rights just because she’s a bitter old woman. She didn’t care about fairness or truth. I hope one day she’s held accountable for the lives she’s ruined with her personal vendettas. She’s far from honorable—just an insecure woman, abusing her position to satisfy her own resentment.

Litigant

Comment #: CA52946
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Someone wrote a comment with a bunch of stars, one day after my hearing before Judge Jeanmarie Warren, envoquing, supposedly, her having to deal with "nonsense and ignorance"!
1. No one forces a judge to practice law, to spend years in litigation or to seek the bench.
2. What a coincidence that one day after I perceived her rulings as biased, abusive and one-sided, appears this 10-star comment in her favor when no comments were ever posted about her!
3. If this person, supposedly, an independent litigant, include his/her real name, case number and the date he/she appeared before judge Warren so that we could verify the independence and truthfulness of the comment.
4. If you label litigants' desire for justice as "nonsense and ignorant", what were you doing in court litigating? Obviously, either you or your opposing party or both are part of the "nonsense and ignorance", you're a lying individual or a kiss-ass!.
Judge Warren, despite evidence of my cases being related, tried to bully me to give up the right to have the cases heard together, tried to bully me to give up my right to subpoena witnesses, refused to hold witnesses accountable, refused to issue body attachments to force witnesses to appear, tried to bully me into proceeding with my case without subpoenaed witnesses, scheduled a future hearing 3 days in the future without the necessary period to subpoena witnesses (minimum of 5 days), attempted to shut me up, seemed to be more accommodating to my opponents and commented that she didn't care if the clerk had deemed my cases related!!!
Judge Jean-Marie Warren is the supervising judge of Long Beach family court, she had ruled on temporary restraining order requests by me and against me and must be familiar with my attempts to convince the courts and the police forces to protect my children from criminal actions by my neighbors.
It's my belief that the Los Angeles County, state of California and Federal justice systems are biased, at times ruthless, unfair and unjust.
It's my belief that it's a systematic problem, one which started with the genocide against the natives and ending with the support of the genocide of the Palestinians.
Edward Moore, formerly Ahmed Dmini.
(818)693-1280.
adamx2@yahoo.com
February 19th, 2024.

Litigant

Comment #: CA52880
Rating:10.0

Comments:
This judge deserves more recognition for the amount of petty nonsense and ignorance she has to deal with in Long Beach family court. She tries to let everyone be heard but I also appreciate that she pushes cases along when others would otherwise get lost playing the “service game”. I feel bad for all the stuff she has to listen to on a daily basis. She’s a saint.