"The Robing Room: CA State Judges

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Kerry L White

Comments

Other

Comment #: CA53315
Rating:2.0

Comments:
Judge White has treated me very unfairly during my pretrail hearings. He gave me several demeaning stares at me while I was seated at the hearings as if he was disgusted and I was already guilty of the allegations presented by the DA. He was rude to me and cut me off from speaking several times when I was asked to speak. He is very disrespectful and his ruling to aim to punish me at all costs. He also made a very inappropriate comment during a hearing which was; "a man with a brief case is more dangerous than a man with a gun". The charges I am fighting are white collar and he was clearly expressing his opinion of me which is not allowed by a judge. He is clearly pro-prosecution and very biased to the DA because he was a prosecutor for 33 years prior to being appointed to the bench in 2017. He has only been on the for bench for 7 years and its clear he cannot put away his prosecutor hat to be fair to defendant. This is not how the judicial process should be carried out. I have reported him to the committee for judicial review of California.