"The Robing Room: CA State Judges

Hon. Stephanie Grogan Jones	See Rating Details
Judge Superior Court
Solano County	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 3.0 - 1 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 4 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Stephanie Grogan Jones

Comments

Other

Comment #: CA55199
Rating:1.0

Comments:
She it terrible, and to think she is a founder of the Elimination of Bias committee. The father lies in court, doesn't follow orders and she says it fine. She doesn't allow me to speak and awards him what he wants. Not to mention SHE puts misinformation down on the minutes and orders and there is no stenographer. I plan of filing something with the appellate courts or something like that. I'm still doing my research. But yes she is very bias and I will be using this website as evidence . Thank you. She also uses the word "irregardless" she is a joke

Other

Comment #: CA54985
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Dishonorable Grogan-Jones needs to be taken off the bench before her ruling results in the death of a child. She's BIASED beyond comprehension in favor of abusive "fathers". She silences & further victimizes victims of domestic abuse. She empowers & enables abusers. She violates all Family Codes, constitutional rights, & behaves like a criminal defense attorney rather than an unbiased judge.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA54611
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Very biased! I expressed deep concern WITH PROOF about my child’s safety matter and she completely didn’t care. It was actually disgusting how she ruled over my custody case

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA54361
Rating:3.0

Comments:
Horrible, biased against mothers, doesn’t read declarations, men will get 50/50 regardless in her courtroom. I file a modification based on ex not following orders, she decreased his time temporarily and he didn’t follow those orders, went back to court and she ended up giving him more time than he had from the start. She didn’t care about him not following temporary orders, told me that was “in the past” her current temporary orders that he disregarded were now “in the past”. Now he has more time on paper and I make more money than him so now he’s threatening me daily that he will get child support from me. So, ultimately I’m paying him to take care of his kids cause he’s all of a sudden now following the orders. Thanks to the judge for empowering him to this extent. I was initially trying to get a modification because I had the kids 95 percent of time and he refused to help me physically or financially and in order for me to get support ( he makes 150k a year) I would need to get his time reduced on paper based on what he was actually doing. She didn’t care that he didn’t follow the custody orders. So, I filed a modification and he has more time on paper and now I have to pay him. The court system is a joke and this judge just enables sorry men to do whatever they want.

Other

Comment #: CA54330
Rating:1.0

Comments:
This Judge doesn't let the person who doesn't have representation talk. Doesn't follow what a hearing is about. She doesn't know what the order is and doesn't care.

Litigant

Comment #: CA53075
Rating:1.0

Comments:
She's biased and does not care about what is in the best interest of the child. She favors attorneys and silences non-represented litigants.