Hon. Jordan Sheinbaum See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Santa Cruz County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   10.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Jordan Sheinbaum


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: CA54475
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge was biased and rude questioning my “credibility” at a continuance hearing for a DVRO. He ordered me personally present at the next hearing where i will be forced to face my abuser who has put me through a decade of trauma as well as my son. This judge clearly did not know the history and as a survivor or DV Is intentionally planing my safety in jeopardy and inflicting unnecessary trauma adding to my already CPTSD ! I am appalled that this judge had questioned my credibility as I appeared remotely to ensure my safety and had the odasity to ask why I did not want to be personally present at the next hearing !?! ARE YOU KIDDING ME !?! I’m filing a RESTRAINING ORDER WITH case numbers and several incidents perpetrated by my ex who plays some feeble innocent harmless victim in court yet is in reality a monster who has terrorized myself and a detriment to our son. So once again I am forced to be subjected to abuse enabled by the very court system that is supposed to protect … why am i surprised … justice at its finest … newer judges need to research these cases and possibly do some background learning but this will never happen with the caseload it’s terribly sad and a gamble at justice … not to mention my safety … I feel a thorough DV training is appropriate…

Civil Litigation - Govt.

Comment #: CA47430
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Judge Sheinbaum is prepared, thoughtful, and respectful to everyone who appears before him.