Hon. Kevin A. Enright See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
San Diego County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   5.8 - 7 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Kevin A. Enright


Comments


Civil Litigation - Govt.

Comment #: CA44472
Rating:9.5
Comments:
I tried my very first jury trial before Judge Enright and had a thoroughly wonderful experience in his courtroom. He is fair, patient, and explains his rulings to counsel. He does a long, thorough court voir dire.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA39094
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Seems so quiet, considerate and engaged until he issues a ruling that ignores every fact, law, evidence and testimony and simply rewrites the facts to his liking. Never saw such disregard for law and common decency. Destroyed an innocent life while rewarding corrupt attorneys and their clients and ignoring their litigation misconduct. DON'T LET THIS ONE FOOL YOU. IF YOU AREN'T THE PARTY WITH THE MOT EXPENSIVE LAWYERS, PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE IMMEDIATELY!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA34930
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I have a lot of trouble understanding the positive ratings of this judge. Yes, he seemed even-tempered and impartial because he doesn't comment on anything at hearings to keep everything off the record and then issues ridiculous rulings that ignore all facts and law that defeat the arguments of his favored attorneys. I've never experienced such blatant bias in my entire career.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA28546
Rating:10.0
Comments:
one nice man. very fair minded. best to you and I am glad at least one good judge remains.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA12908
Rating:4.5
Comments:
Committed obvious reversible error with regard to duplicate experts testifying on the same subject matter (exactly).

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA11573
Rating:10.0
Comments:
I tried a case in front of judge Enright in the summer of 2017 that went for 7 weeks. He is one of the most even tempered and fair judges I have experienced and I have tried more than 90 cases. It was an absolute pleasure being in his courtroom.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA6478
Rating:4.6
Comments:
Judge Enright seems like he is a nice enough person and most litigants really like him. However, he seems to defer to large firm lawyers, and allow a large firm lawyer to thoroughly abuse the schedule of a small firm lawyer, seemingly with no regard to the lack of justice that can come out of that. My case ended up fine, mostly because he is also not very pro active and lets the jury do what its job is. One gets the feeling that sometimes he wants to bait the attorneys into screwing up. Courtroom has many dark days as well, and what could be a two week trial may turn out to be 5. But no consideration at all for the lawyer's schedules. They don't matter.