Hon. Susan M. Breall See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
San Francisco County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.7 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Susan M. Breall


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA2757
Rating:1.1
Comments:
Hon susan breall did not protect my constitutional right and clearly violated the Rules of Court :
my speedy trial was set to begin on 02/5/11
on 1/25/11 I appear in her court room and in open court I I refuse to suspend the speedy trial and insisted going to trial within the time allowed by law because I know the District Attorney have no case to take me to trial they just want to obtain conviction by pleading guilty, after I claim my constitutional rights hon judge Susan breall retaliate and move in discrimination matter and asked for a mental evaluation with the help of the court appointed defender murray zisholz who was there to convict Me and to work against my best of interest that's why he refuse to release my case to my private attorney mr George Walker. after those ladies and gentleman asked for a mental evaluation they went around the law and the Constitution and illegally suspended my speedy trial from proceeding to give the distric attorney more time to build case against me, and not just this I was mentally evaluated by a Certified Professional doctor mr David kessler his report was submitted to the court and stated there is no mental health issues or a problem whatsoever he is not happy with this attorney murray zisholz and he should release to the private attorney mr George Walker.hon suzan breall and hon Mary Morgan discard the doctor report and they kept the court appointed defender to take me to trial and tell the jure I have mental health issues has yet to be dealt with to obtain conviction!!! what is make it more interested when I dress the jure about the court appointed defender again they retaliate against me and move me from my trial I was not present in court room !!! then the court appointed defender asked the court to send me to mental facility I responded from the holding cell and I told judge is Susan breall that's illegal your honor I have the right to appeal my case,judge breall respond to me and said good luck with the appeal process sir !!! I know hard to believe but this is what happened to me there is a court transcript.
I am a good citizen, register voter and i bay tax i have the right all the rights to practice my constitutional rights and no 1 should take it away, my first goal to practice law because I learn a lots in this case !!!
god protect the Constitution of the United State