Hon. Glenn R. Salter
Judge
Superior Court
Orange County


Rate a judge
Attorney Average Rating:   2.8 - 14 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   2.0 - 30 rating(s)


General Rating Criteria

* Temp. Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Sch. Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Indu. Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Comp. Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punct. Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* Ab-Pr. General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* Ab-Tr. General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flex Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
    

Criminal Case Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Ev-Cr. Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Bail General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Plea Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
Inc.-Pr. General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
Inc.-Tr. General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
Inc.-S. General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Case Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Ev-Cv. Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Settle Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
Inc. General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
    
  

General Rating Criteria

Criminal Case Rating Criteria
(if applicable)

Civil Case Rating Criteria
(if applicable)

EvaluatorIDDate*Temp.*Sch.*Indu.*Comp.*Punct.*Ab-Pr.*Ab-Tr.Flex
Civil Litigation - Private12088810/05/20231155105110
Civil Litigation - Private10453204/28/20221010101010101010
Civil Litigation - Private9213401/29/2021141110111
Civil Litigation - Private7668009/25/201911117 1 
Criminal Defense Lawyer3921511/30/2015        
Criminal Defense Lawyer3791310/06/2015        
Civil Litigation - Private3720808/28/2015   1 11 
Civil Litigation - Private3091411/10/201412111113
Criminal Defense Lawyer2864108/07/2014        
Civil Litigation - Private2862308/06/201422115214
Criminal Defense Lawyer2861508/06/201411111111
Criminal Defense Lawyer2861408/06/2014        
Criminal Defense Lawyer2823907/21/20142 211 14
Civil Litigation - Private2704105/18/201411111111
Criminal Defense Lawyer2680805/06/201411111111
Criminal Defense Lawyer2680705/06/201411111111
Civil Litigation - Private2676905/04/20142222 222
Civil Litigation - Private2283708/14/201310109810101010
Category Average  2.63.02.82.54.83.02.44.0
   
ID*Ev-Cr.BailPleaInc.-Pr.Inc.-Tr.Inc.-S.
120888      
104532      
92134      
76680      
39215      
37913      
37208      
30914      
28641      
28623      
28615 11111
28614      
28239      
27041      
26808      
26807      
26769222   
22837      
 2.01.51.51.01.01.0
ID*Ev-Cv.SettleInc.Average
12088815103.6
10453210101010.0
921341112.5
766801 11.9
39215   0.0
37913   0.0
3720811 1.0
3091411 1.1
28641   0.0
286231111.9
286151111.0
28614   0.0
28239   1.4
270411111.0
268081111.0
268071111.0
26769   2.0
2283710  9.6
 2.52.33.02.2

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

Non-attorney Rating
(if applicable)

EvaluatorIDDateJudgeIDOvr.AverageReadComment
Other12728806/15/2024152141010.0Read Comment
Litigant12604703/28/20241521455.0Read Comment
Litigant9795808/19/202115214  Read Comment
Other9365503/18/20211521411.0 
Other9365403/18/202115214  Read Comment
Litigant5359101/17/20181521466.0Read Comment
Litigant3828410/16/20151521422.0Read Comment
Litigant3827810/16/20151521411.0Read Comment
Other3791210/06/201515214  Read Comment
Other3790810/05/201515214  Read Comment
Other3516206/03/2015152141010.0Read Comment
Litigant3187412/24/201415214  Read Comment
Other3122111/22/201415214  Read Comment
Other3097111/12/20141521433.0Read Comment
Court Staff3096911/12/201415214  Read Comment
Other2878008/14/201415214  Read Comment
Other2869008/09/20141521411.0Read Comment
Other2866708/08/20141521411.0Read Comment
Other2865608/07/201415214  Read Comment
Other2865208/07/20141521411.0Read Comment
Other2865108/07/20141521411.0Read Comment
Other2865008/07/20141521411.0Read Comment
Other2864708/07/20141521411.0Read Comment
Other2864608/07/20141521411.0Read Comment
Other2864508/07/201415214  Read Comment
Other2864408/07/20141521411.0 
Other2863808/07/20141521411.0Read Comment
Other2863608/07/20141521411.0Read Comment
Other2863108/07/20141521411.0Read Comment
Other2862608/06/20141521411.0Read Comment
Other2862508/06/201415214  Read Comment
Other2862208/06/20141521411.0Read Comment
Other2862008/06/20141521411.0Read Comment
Other2861608/06/20141521411.0Read Comment
Other2847407/30/20141521411.0Read Comment
Litigant2833407/25/201415214  Read Comment
Other2823807/21/20141521411.0Read Comment
Other2693005/12/201415214  Read Comment
Litigant2680605/06/20141521411.0Read Comment
Other2670004/30/20141521411.0Read Comment
Litigant2668904/30/201415214  Read Comment
Other2668804/30/201415214  Read Comment
Court Staff2665404/26/20141521411.0Read Comment
Other2396610/30/20131521411.0Read Comment
Litigant2320909/08/20131521422.0Read Comment
Category Average   2.02.0