Hon. Joseph Reeder See Rating Details
Circuit Judge
Court
Putnam County
29th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Joseph Reeder


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: WV329
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Didn't even give me a chance to talk and was totally against me from begining. The only chance I did get was the last heering and I was totally blindsided and wasn't prepared on what I really meant and wanted to say.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: WV328
Rating:1.0
Comments:
There was no criminal action it was simply Reeder taking my parental rights without giving me a chance. All because DHHR wanted them incentives. DHHR switched workers so many times and they all gave their opinions some didn't even get to do that and which it was do their benefit to take my babies away for good.

Other

Comment #: WV323
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
He's a disgrace ruling against families and going against the law. He ruled my dad's step daughter was to be in control of him, when I was his only living next of kin. This step daughter robbed my dad blind from all his property and assets. Dishonorable Reeder was probably paid off. $Sad